I'm confused by the
bolded part above. I'm a backpacker, but only recently did I start bothering to carry
any sort of stove, and what I carry is a simple homemade Penny-stove (out of Heineken cans) along with sufficient EtOH to boil water in my little pot in case I cannot find alternate fuel for a fire - i.e. the stove+EtOH is for emergencies (why carry all that fuel around? Waste of space and weight). My normal cooking is performed over a small fire composed of wood from the near vicinity, no stove involved. WHY would you bring a stove to put WOOD in??

I don't understand.
Prepping "small" wood can be accomplished with an SAK and your own hands (making tinder and kindling) - an additional fixed-blade of similar length is unnecessary weight, imho.
The fixed blade you should carry (again, imho) is for preparing LARGE wood, where chopping and batonning come into play, i.e. supplanting the role of a hatchet or axe which is extra weight. For this purpose, the fixed-blade should be ~5"+ and thin enough to slide through batonned sections of wood - a role in which I have personally experienced the insufficiency of smaller knives.
Now, if a hatchet or axe is presumed
unnecessary for the proposed venture or will be packed
regardless of being extra weight, then I totally agree that the small fixed-blade is more than sufficient - heck, you'll probably only use the SAK as a back-up, especially if the most "robust" chores are merely "prepping small wood..., prepping food and cleaning fish & foul" (chores for which an SAK is sufficient).
I'm worried I'm hijacking the thread by presenting these opinions, I'm sure this topic is commonly dealt with in WS&S.
To sum-up: if no hatchet is necessary for the venture, a Mora Clipper, Izula (I or II), or BK11 or 14 all seem good choices as your primary blade, 3" :thumbup:. However, for processing larger or frozen wood, bring a hatchet or a bigger knife.
Oh, and be darn sure to bring a camera with lots of photo space to those parks!!! Scenery that'll leave you breathless...