Bad bad bad experience with Knifekits.com

I've seen this before and know it can be a pain, at least for me. Personally, I think $9 is still too much.

I've always wondered why people get their panties in a wad over the price that sellers charge for shipping. Personally I concern myself more with the total cost to me for what I want to buy, and less with how much some piece of paper says is going to the cost of the item vs. cost of shipping.

The logic that says it is wrong to be charged $9 for shipping when the sellers actual monetary cost is "only" $4.99 (USPS flat rate envelope), would also say it is wrong for that seller to sell what is in all likelihood less than $5 worth of stuff for $16. No?

Are you saying that profit on money invested in the product is OK, but profit on money invested in the time effort and cost of shipping is wrong?
 
I've always wondered why people get their panties in a wad over the price that sellers charge for shipping. Personally I concern myself more with the total cost to me for what I want to buy, and less with how much some piece of paper says is going to the cost of the item vs. cost of shipping.

The logic that says it is wrong to be charged $9 for shipping when the sellers actual monetary cost is "only" $4.99 (USPS flat rate envelope), would also say it is wrong for that seller to sell what is in all likelihood less than $5 worth of stuff for $16. No?

Are you saying that profit on money invested in the product is OK, but profit on money invested in the time effort and cost of shipping is wrong?

great post :thumbup:
 
I've always wondered why people get their panties in a wad over the price that sellers charge for shipping.
I don't wear panties (at least, you'll never find photos to prove it).
I concern myself more with the total cost to me for what I want to buy, and less with how much some piece of paper says is going to the cost of the item vs. cost of shipping.
Since the cost of the item *plus* that of shipping = the "total cost", seems like the same concern to me.
The logic that says it is wrong to be charged $9 for shipping when the sellers actual monetary cost is "only" $4.99 (USPS flat rate envelope), would also say it is wrong for that seller to sell what is in all likelihood less than $5 worth of stuff for $16. No?
No. There's no right or wrong here. For me, it just comes down to the total price. If I don't like it, that's my prerogative as a consumer, and I can easily just spend my money elsewhere.
Are you saying that profit on money invested in the product is OK, but profit on money invested in the time effort and cost of shipping is wrong?
Not at all. Again, for me, it's simply about the total cost, and wether or not I feel I'm overpaying.

Having said all this, shipping cost was not my main concern with the transaction posted about in this thread. I'm more interested in the process & timing of the deal at issue. Focusing too much on just this one area (shipping cost) is a distraction, imo. At the very least, I don't see it as a major reason of why this deal went bad, especially since the OP was aware of the shipping cost and paid said amount.
 
Last edited:
Honest question, I do not know the answer!

Why should a merchant make a profit on shipping and handling, should the profit be made on the sale of the item and shipping costs be the actual costs???
 
Honest question, I do not know the answer!

Why should a merchant make a profit on shipping and handling, should the profit be made on the sale of the item and shipping costs be the actual costs???

I know speaking for myself, I charge a flat rate. Sometimes I make a profit, sometimes it's a loss. It pretty much evens out. Of course I'm only dabbling, it's not my livelihood on the line.
 
Honest question, I do not know the answer!

Why should a merchant make a profit on shipping and handling, should the profit be made on the sale of the item and shipping costs be the actual costs???

The short answer is because that is why they are in business.
In all seriousness, every dollar you have to spend as a business better bring back something more than a dollar in sales. And in retail sales that better be about 40-50% more, at least.
I like to tell people, I can go broke at home watching cartoons, I don't need to work all day to do that.
 
I don't have any problem paying more than the actual shipping cost.
Packaging supplies cost money.
Paying someone to pack up and address a shipment costs money.
However, I do usually balk when I'm ordering something tiny--say a pack of Chicago screws that could easily go in a bubble envelope--and it costs me $10.95 for the lowest rate.
That's the vendor's choice to charge and my choice to choose. Beauty of capitalism and all that.

My original point, however, was that a $10 (or $9) charge for a set of items that can't cover my palm seems like it ought to include insurance, either paid insurance or a solid assurance from the vendor that the item is going to make it to my doorstep.
However, mileage is going to vary on that opinion.
 
I don't have any problem paying more than the actual shipping cost.
Packaging supplies cost money.
Paying someone to pack up and address a shipment costs money.
However, I do usually balk when I'm ordering something tiny--say a pack of Chicago screws that could easily go in a bubble envelope--and it costs me $10.95 for the lowest rate.
That's the vendor's choice to charge and my choice to choose. Beauty of capitalism and all that.

My original point, however, was that a $10 (or $9) charge for a set of items that can't cover my palm seems like it ought to include insurance, either paid insurance or a solid assurance from the vendor that the item is going to make it to my doorstep.
However, mileage is going to vary on that opinion.

I agree in that the seller is responsible, period, until the buyer receives his purchase in satisfactory condition. Insurance is for the seller, not the buyer.
 
Hi Folks!

I apologize for the late post. I am sure some of you are waiting for my take on this post that I started. First of all, let me tell you that Mr. Jonathan Musick sent me an email yesterday. In the spirit of transparency, here's an excerpt from his email:

After examining all the facts the company owner determined that due to our upgrading the shipping to a method other than that of which you had chose, it was our responsibility to reship your order. You should receive your order via FedEx tomorrow.

Although I have not yet received the shipment today, I thank Mr. Musick for considering the "facts" of the matter - although they have not clearly accepted their resposibility and poor judgement of the situation. Just the same, he stepped up on his game and I am grateful for the gesture.

I believed I received the email after this thread was called to KK's attention by one of the posters. BFC rocks for being a great forum that is not only informative but an effective vehicle for dessiminating customer grievances. Kudos to you!

Let me respond to Mr. Whetsell's reply.

Sir, the first line of your post says exactly what YOU and your company needs....

That's a lot of credibility points for a guy with one (1) BF post!!

A good understanding of customers needs and wants. Think of the situation in a retail store - face to face transaction. If I complain about bad service to you as an owner of the store, you would first ask how credible I am? Well, I am your customer, is that credible enough for you? If you want to talk about credibility - lets say, I am almost like you. I am a Senior Executive of a Fortune 200 company that deals in the service industry - 20+ years experience. I am a college graduate with post graduate degree from one of the top 10 U.S. Universities. I am a knife collector (mostly Scandinavian) and has recently became a fan of Ka-Bar BK series. Is that good enough for you?

Your long rant in defense of Mr. Musick is laudable. Almost mind-boggling that it may have cost you more to monolouge than simply just resolving my simple and petty problem. First of all, I never said that Jonathan is a bad person. All I am complaining about is how he handled the situation. Heck, I wasn't even complaining about your exorbitant shipping rate (lowest shipping at $9 for a $4.99 usps flat rate envelope with no insurance?). You see, your policy have surely influenced his decision to write me off the bat. Even if I repeatedly asked and begged for a concession (meaning, "at least satisfy me on this transaction, its not my fault"). I told him that among my orders, the most imporant item is the Tek Lok because I already disassembled my sheath and I have a camping trip over the weekend. All he said is "I understand but we have a policy and all we can tell you is order the item again and have it shipped by Fedex." To his credit, he did offered a discounted cost but I thought thats ridiculous considering that the cost of the items I ordered is just $16.

Okay, here's your policy posted in your website:

We will attempt to ship all orders received before 12:00PM on each business day. Orders received after 12:00PM will be shipped within 24 hours, or the following business day. KnifeKits.com will arrange for shipment of ordered product(s) to the Customer, Free On Board (F.O.B.) shipping point, meaning title to the product(s) and risk of loss passes to the Customer upon delivery to the carrier. KnifeKits.com will advise Customer of estimated shipping dates, but KnifeKits.com will, under no circumstances, be responsible for delays in delivery, and associated damages, due to events beyond its reasonable control, including without limitation, acts of God or public enemy, acts of federal, state or local government, fire, floods, civil disobedience, strikes, lockouts, and freight embargoes.

Do you really think this is necessary albeit it is wrong? Your responsibility as an "On-line Retailer" is to make sure that your mechandise gets into the hands of your customer. The "customer experience" doesn't end when YOU make the sale. It ends when your customer received the mechandise and praised you for the excellent service. That's your goal - not just to make the sale! To put an irony in this policy, are you saying that me as a customer can also say that if my money leaves my pocket and you received a notice that the payment has been sent - but in the end you did not. Can I say that our transaction should be as good as sold and I should get my mechandise even if you didn't get your money?

I also think you need to revisit this statement:

All we ask is that you pick the quality of delivery based on a certain assumption of risk/reward.

Really? I tell you, you put this policy in large bold letter on your website and you will see your numebr of customers drop significantly.

A simple search of KnifeKits.com on these forums returned over 500 posts worth of historic content about our company. I’ll let that do our reputation defending!

Again, really? You see, 500 positive posts can be undone by 1 negative post. That's an industry fact. Because our technology today and the way we communicate travels faster than you think. People nowadays blog, tweet, posts to forum and update their facebook account. Unfortunately, I do them all! So if the conventional wisdom is 1 cutomer equals 10 referrals, today, you multiply that by 10 or more. Because your audience is bigger in the internet.

If you didn't received the link to this thread, you wouldn't have the chance to "defend" yourself. Actually, I wasn't expecting a long defensive rant. As an owner, I have higher expectations to you on the way you handle this situation. Seems like you leveleld yourself with your people instead of of being the "beacon of hope" that everyone expected you to be.

Your second post comment made me frown more:

Regarding the “risk/reward” aspect of shipping…

Hey man… they call it ground shipping for a reason. By the time it gets there, it’s been on the ground a lot. I guess that I have an unfair advantage on you. I’ve actually seen enough shipments to know what really works and what doesn’t. Show me someone in here who ships more than me for less money and I’ll listen to them. Short of schooling you and not the other way around, I’m out of here on this note…

I sent the customer’s package overnight FedEx. I'm a professional shipper and see what I choose? It doesn’t matter if they have to climb up a flagpole to deliver it, it will be there, unscratched, with a 10-gun salute tomorrow. I didn’t send it for any of your reasons. I sent it because we assumed the full risk when we upgraded his shipping method to Priority. If it were only parcel post, like he ordered, this wouldn’t be an issue to discuss until a week after next. I can see the smile on every real merchants face right now. Let he who hath ears, hear!

I think I've said enough. The beauty of a forum is it lets the truth out and it gives clarity to a simple situation gone bad because it was poorly handled. The only thing I can tell you Mr. Whetsell is LISTEN. Don't "school" your customers. That's the best way to double your historic 500 threads here in BFC. And double your sales for being the one of most customer-driven retailer in the internet.

Goodluck to you!
 
...I believed I received the email after this thread was called to KK's attention by one of the posters. BFC rocks for being a great forum that is not only informative but an effective vehicle for dessiminating customer grievances. Kudos to you! ...

...I think I've said enough. The beauty of a forum is it lets the truth out and it gives clarity to a simple situation gone bad because it was poorly handled. The only thing I can tell you Mr. Whetsell is LISTEN. Don't "school" your customers. ...
Maverick888, thank you for following up with us regarding this issue.

Now, I see why VirtualEdge didn't answer my question regarding the timing of events. Based on what you've shared here, it seems clear to me that it was your BF post which motivated making this transaction right.

Good for you. I'm glad things worked out.

School's out! :D
 
Truth be told, Maverick888, you bought with an explicit policy in place.
You're fortunate that Knifekits is going above and beyond their policy to replace your several items.
I think they're being responsible.

That said, the policy itself is questionable to me.
Especially if it costs $9 to get (less than) a handful of items.
 
"I am a Senior Executive of a Fortune 200 company that deals in the service industry - 20+ years experience. I am a college graduate with post graduate degree from one of the top 10 U.S. Universities."

The above statement is direct quote from the OP's second post. I am glad he added that and enlightened me, because prior to reading this I thought he was probably some 16 year old living at home with his parents. If this little shipping problem upsets him this much, I can only imagine how he must react when a real problem arises within his "Fotune 200" company.:rolleyes:

Paul
 
"I am a Senior Executive of a Fortune 200 company that deals in the service industry - 20+ years experience. I am a college graduate with post graduate degree from one of the top 10 U.S. Universities."

The above statement is direct quote from the OP's second post. I am glad he added that and enlightened me, because prior to reading this I thought he was probably some 16 year old living at home with his parents. If this little shipping problem upsets him this much, I can only imagine how he must react when a real problem arises within his "Fotune 200" company.:rolleyes:

Paul

One would have to wonder....

I don't know why in this day and age, this type of thing happens. After all of the hand wringing and teeth gnashing over shipping on internet transactions over the last 15 years, I am still surprised that people don't verify shipping ahead of time.

I learned a long time ago that often businesses quote the cheapest price possible they can in the internet so they can get as much business as possible. And that quoted price is what you pay for that item.

However, they still have to pay someone to go pull the item, someone to bubble wrap, tape, address the label, seal the box, put it in the shipping queue, register it into the system as shipped (with the necessary details), and possibly update inventory depending on their system.

What? So you say that only takes about 15 minutes? If you are paying a literate and trustworthy warehouse employee a measly $10 an hour, that costs the employer another $2- $3 or so on his end for matching taxes, unemployment, etc. So you add that 1/4 hour back onto the shipping as a cost of doing business. So on the low end, another $3 is your cost to ship on top of the carrier's cost.

Where should that money come from? You read all the time on this forum and most others how folks crow over getting the absolute best price on something.... it lets you know how important that criteria is to them. But a seller can't afford to eat it, time after time. If you buy an expensive item with a large markup, you can absorb the extra handling fees and insurance.

If you are buying $3 - $5 worth of ball chain, is the labor involved any different from a more expensive item? The shipping looks out of whack to have $8 on a $3 worth of ball chain, but fine on $75 knife. Yet the above mentioned labor added to get the product out the door is the same.

After many years of internet purchases, and hundreds of purchases (literally!), I NEVER BUY WITHOUT VERIFYING SHIPPING. NEVER. PERIOD.

I don't call vendor to negotiate unless it is unclear on the website or I am making multiple purchases and their site gives me the same shipping on each item. I don't buy from someone that won't give me a shipping quote online or by phone.

Yes, I learned that the hard way. Back in the old online auction days, I bought a small hand tool for $6. I still remember my shock at paying $14.95 for shipping and handling. I could have bought the same tool locally for about $19.95, and could have had it in my hand immediately and been able to take care of any warranty issues in minutes had their been any.

So as a business owner reading this thread, I would caution everyone to do their homework, and all of it. Call or email the vendor you want to use and find out how he handles his shipping method and what you get for your buck. Handling is part of doing business. If you don't like the price after you do your due diligence, move on.

BTW, I am surprised and pleased that the vendor responded in such a positive and patient manner. It is strange to see a brand new, freshly minted member have a place to vent about a purchase he made somewhere else for all to see. With one or two posts, he sure made had a lot of credibility here. On other areas of this fine site, others would have cautioned him more upfront, and been a lot more careful about him taking a known and respected vendor to task.

Such as it is, I am glad to see it all work out.

Robert
 
Paul and Robert: You Texan's speak clearly and well. :)

Robert: SO well put. Eye-opening wisdom. Thanks for taking this time to clarify.

Coop
 
...I thought he was probably some 16 year old living at home with his parents. If this little shipping problem upsets him this much, I can only imagine how he must react when a real problem arises within his "Fotune 200" company. ...Paul
I think you're missing the point, and would be underestimating Maverick888's intentions/actions. He wasn't getting satisfaction from the merchant, so he took his case to the Internet, in an arena he knew related and/or carried weight regarding that merchant.

...I learned a long time ago that often businesses quote the cheapest price possible they can in the internet so they can get as much business as possible.
Maybe. For me, since web stores are so easy & inexpensive to set up, I see the same business opening multiple store fronts and quoting much different prices for the same exact item, sometimes distorting a more reasonable MSRP on that item.

That's one of the things I like about eBay, not for buying from, but for seeing how the same seller works. eBay is like a mini-businessworld when it comes to marketing. One can learn a lot from studying tactics, there.
BTW, I am surprised and pleased that the vendor responded in such a positive and patient manner. It is strange to see a brand new, freshly minted member have a place to vent about a purchase he made somewhere else for all to see. With one or two posts, he sure made had a lot of credibility here. On other areas of this fine site, others would have cautioned him more upfront, and been a lot more careful about him taking a known and respected vendor to task.
I'm not surprised at all that the vendor made the transaction right, apparently *after* Maverick888 posted here. Btw, I didn't get that same impression of patience. Rather, I sensed a quick party-line response. Furthermore, I don't believe Maverick888 did anything wrong. He seems to be a savvy consumer who took necessary action to be heard and get results.

In the end, I believe Maverick888 proved to be very upfront. I put the question out there regarding the timing of the replacement order. VirtualEdge didn't respond to that. Instead, we got diverted to shipping cost, imo. It was Maverick888 who finally provided the timing. By doing so, I believe it was VirtualEdge who wasn't entirely upfront, and perhaps, maybe even deceptive, at least to me. VirtualEdge gave a nice speech, but only provided some very broad strokes, leaving out very telling details, in my opinion.

*When* the order was replaced speaks volumes, I believe.

Such as it is, I am glad to see it all work out.
Agreed.

Edit: Btw, in this thread, Maverick888 wasn't the only one who claimed to have had an unresolved issue with this Seller (up until the posting of this thread).

...My cousin did have an issue that remained unresolved with them though.

Perhaps if Maverick888 hadn't taken to this forum, he would've joined an unknown number of folks who never got their items and/or refunds.

Maybe it's only about a few bucks to some. To me, I see it as a matter of strong principle.
 
Last edited:
I think you're missing the point, and would be underestimating Maverick888's intention/actions. He wasn't getting satisfaction from the merchant, so he took his case to the Internet, in an arena he knew related and/or carried weight regarding that merchant.

No, I think you are missing the point. The point was and is that it is MY opinion Maverick888 came off like a 16 year old. His posts certainly don't reflect the demeanor of a Senior Executive, and yes, I would recognize one when I see one having been down that path myself.

Speaking of missed points, you seem to have missed quite few made by other members here. Perhaps you were too busy cheer leading to notice.

Paul
 
Last edited:
... No, I think you are missing the point. The point was and is that it is MY opinion Maverick888 came off like a 16 year old. His posts certainly don't reflect the demeanor of a Senior Executive, and yes, I would recognize one when I see one having been down that path myself.

Speaking of missed points, you seem to have missed quite few made by other members here. Perhaps you were too busy cheer leading to notice
Edit: [Decided to edit/delete my opening remarks. Don't want to come across too adversarial and/or distract (any more) from the topic of this thread.]

sheathmaker, if you'd like to clarify what points I've missed, by all means, feel free to post them here. Before you do though, keep in mind that just because I didn't post my own view/s on a few things (because as you've noted, other Members had already brought them up), that doesn't mean I missed anything. I simply chose to highlight areas I felt were being overlooked.

Regardless, I would very much welcome discussing it with you further, Mr. Senior Executive. :D

Btw, you might want to learn how to use the Quote option.
 
Last edited:
So, Mr. Sheathmaker, how does a Senior Executive should complain, in your humble opinion? :D. Sorry, I am not going to present an executive summary of my complain. Ive done my part using my executive demeanor when I tried to resolve the matter to them. So, I am just complaining now, period. No sugar coating. Just an unadulterated or raw description of facts. Who knows, people should complain like 16 yrs old to be understood instead of just being politically correct, don't you think?

I don't think I cursed them, did I?
 
Back
Top