- Joined
- Jun 5, 2002
- Messages
- 2,761
I think this is one of those unfortunate incidents where neither side really did anything very wrong, nor is either party in my eyes a bad, or untrustworthy person, and yet, here we are. I think both parties should write each other off as far as future dealings go, but I personally would not neccessarily avoid either if a deal presented itself, I dont think either person is too much at fault.
I do think however that as soon as the knife was listed on Ebay, the seller no longer had any responsibility to take it back, no matter what, it's sold at that point as far as I'm concerned. Of course I understand the other side too, where the buyer felt he was not going to get a response from the seller, so took matters nto his own hands, like I said, this is one of those things where everything just went bad.
One point that I find difficult to understand is, the idea of whether a buyer is entitled to return a knife "just because", just because its not what he expected, he realized he couldn't afford it, etc. Where do you draw the line?
Either a buyer can return a knife for any reason, or not, you really can't qualify the reasoning, since obviously, the buyer can really say whatever he wants to, he noticed a tiny flaw (all knives have them if you're anal enough), I don't think you can say: "A buyer can return the knife if it has a flaw, isn't as described, etc". but then say that he can't if the reason is he just doesn't like it, he can't afford it, it's too nice... It has to be one or the other as I see it.
Look, as a sometimes seller, I'd be pissed if a buyer wanted a refund because he just realized he couldn't afford it, it's not "for him", sure, seems like things he should have realized before I sent him the knife, but, as a seller who values this trust based community and wants to always be a trusted seller, I will always take a knife back, for any reason, no matter how lame. Thats just the way I think it should be. Of course I won't if the knife has incurred any damage since it left me, but barring that, yes, I think a buyer should always take a knife back, no questions asked, even if the stated reason is a poor one.
So, when people say that a seller shouldn't take a knife back as long as it was as described, I disagree with this, it sucks to get a knife back you thought was sold, especially under the circumstances the seller was in in this case, but I think that's the the honorable way to do things in knife forums.
And, I'm not saying the seller did not agree to take it back, I'm just commenting on the general issue raised in this thread about how or when a buyer is entitled to a refund.
And yes, maybe technically these are terms that need to be agreed on before the deal happens, but I don't think honor and trust should take a back seat to what amounts to technicalities.
Just my opinion.
I do think however that as soon as the knife was listed on Ebay, the seller no longer had any responsibility to take it back, no matter what, it's sold at that point as far as I'm concerned. Of course I understand the other side too, where the buyer felt he was not going to get a response from the seller, so took matters nto his own hands, like I said, this is one of those things where everything just went bad.
One point that I find difficult to understand is, the idea of whether a buyer is entitled to return a knife "just because", just because its not what he expected, he realized he couldn't afford it, etc. Where do you draw the line?
Either a buyer can return a knife for any reason, or not, you really can't qualify the reasoning, since obviously, the buyer can really say whatever he wants to, he noticed a tiny flaw (all knives have them if you're anal enough), I don't think you can say: "A buyer can return the knife if it has a flaw, isn't as described, etc". but then say that he can't if the reason is he just doesn't like it, he can't afford it, it's too nice... It has to be one or the other as I see it.
Look, as a sometimes seller, I'd be pissed if a buyer wanted a refund because he just realized he couldn't afford it, it's not "for him", sure, seems like things he should have realized before I sent him the knife, but, as a seller who values this trust based community and wants to always be a trusted seller, I will always take a knife back, for any reason, no matter how lame. Thats just the way I think it should be. Of course I won't if the knife has incurred any damage since it left me, but barring that, yes, I think a buyer should always take a knife back, no questions asked, even if the stated reason is a poor one.
So, when people say that a seller shouldn't take a knife back as long as it was as described, I disagree with this, it sucks to get a knife back you thought was sold, especially under the circumstances the seller was in in this case, but I think that's the the honorable way to do things in knife forums.
And, I'm not saying the seller did not agree to take it back, I'm just commenting on the general issue raised in this thread about how or when a buyer is entitled to a refund.
And yes, maybe technically these are terms that need to be agreed on before the deal happens, but I don't think honor and trust should take a back seat to what amounts to technicalities.
Just my opinion.