This is very true.
It is all about blade geometry.
To the OP:
BRKT grinds knives thin. They are great cutters, but edge is not designed to take a lot of abuse. It will hold fine for batonning, if it is done right.
I have used both F1 and Bravo 1. Falk F1 has thicker edge. F1 doesn't cut as good as Bravo1, but F1 has "tougher" edge. In fact two things are related. Grind F1 thinner and you will make it to cut better, but when you will go abusing it, it will deform probably even worse than B1 in that video.
At the same time, you can get that Bravo1, re-profile the edge to more obtuse angle and it will take a lot more abuse.
Its been said so many times that geometry plays the biggest role in "toughness" of the edge and still people overlooking the obvious when question comes up.
I'm glad that BRKT have guts to make knives with such thin grinds and edges and cover them by excellent warranty. It is a lot easier to say that "Abrams Tank-knife" is covered by warranty, than that "Ferrari-knife" is covered, because many users forget about the differences and in some cases treat them the same way.
I would say that Falk F1 is more "universal" knife. After using both F1 and Bravo1, I have decided that I prefer Bravo1 for my kind of use, but I wouldn't say that one is better than another.
Here are couple of threads on the subject:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=782282
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=775806
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=784777