Cobalt
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 1998
- Messages
- 17,721
The battle saw is almost a quarter pound lighter than the ASHBM at 25 ounces, and it just handles and balances perfectly! It bites DEEP and chews through wood like butter. The ASBH doesn't quite feel as nice in hand or chop as smoothly due to the extra weight / different balance. The battle saw also has the CBT, that plus a wider blade gives it another edge in performance over the ASHBM IMHO. The Saw sticks less in thick hardwood as a result of those two factors and is less likely to bind. The battle saw is a knife that feels and handles much lighter than it is.
Personally, I think if the ASHBM was similar in specs to the original SHBM (.25" thick, 10" blade, same width) it would perform and handle better than the ASHBM. I just think the ASHBM is bulkier than it should be and unduly large. I think it actually hurts its performance.
interesting theory. I think it depends on the user. For example a 5'8" 150lb guy may be able to chop better with a smaller blade than a 6' 200lb guy. But the ASHBM is no larger or heavier than most of the really large blades out there. I will say this, having a swedge put on it made a big difference. It handles much faster than my std ASHBM. But at the end of the day, with edge geometry being the same, the larger more forward balanced knife will hit harder. As long as you are strong enough to swing it easily. Just plain physics.