Hammer67
Gold Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2012
- Messages
- 10,490
And this is precisely why I don't usually partake in these threads - because they become arguments in which if you don't opt for a gun, you're a "Timothy Treadwell" type.
It might be easy to stereotype a Canadian researcher as having some sort of "anti gun" bias, but Idaho Fish and Game reached similar conclusions, based on a 10-year review of incidents in Idaho. The likelihood of severe injury or death was much, much higher in incidents where a firearm was involved in a bear incident. This really shouldn't be surprising when you think about it.
In addition, I think that many people are seriously fooling themselves if they think that being proficient with a firearm, and being able to drop an 800-lb, super-pissed off animal coming at you at 35mph with a high-caliber pistol in a very high-stress situation are even remotely the same thing. The latter is an extremely difficult thing to do, to put it mildly (with deadly consequences if you don't succeed...), and going to the range a couple times a week and hitting targets at 15 & 25 yards with your "bear gun" does not really prepare you for the real thing. Not even close.
I have absolutely no "anti-gun" bias whatsoever. Just the opposite in fact. I carry a firearm for protection against my own species, but when it comes to bears, I still opt for spray. That, and continual situational awareness, based on spending lots of time traveling in bear backcountry. That doesn't equate me to that dipshit Treadwell at all.
It might be easy to stereotype a Canadian researcher as having some sort of "anti gun" bias, but Idaho Fish and Game reached similar conclusions, based on a 10-year review of incidents in Idaho. The likelihood of severe injury or death was much, much higher in incidents where a firearm was involved in a bear incident. This really shouldn't be surprising when you think about it.
In addition, I think that many people are seriously fooling themselves if they think that being proficient with a firearm, and being able to drop an 800-lb, super-pissed off animal coming at you at 35mph with a high-caliber pistol in a very high-stress situation are even remotely the same thing. The latter is an extremely difficult thing to do, to put it mildly (with deadly consequences if you don't succeed...), and going to the range a couple times a week and hitting targets at 15 & 25 yards with your "bear gun" does not really prepare you for the real thing. Not even close.
I have absolutely no "anti-gun" bias whatsoever. Just the opposite in fact. I carry a firearm for protection against my own species, but when it comes to bears, I still opt for spray. That, and continual situational awareness, based on spending lots of time traveling in bear backcountry. That doesn't equate me to that dipshit Treadwell at all.