BK-20 vs Bk-9

I didn't have a burger to try, so I used the 20 to flip & serve today's BBQ chicken breast.
Worked like a charm.
Haven't tried the 9 in that capacity yet...
 
Hey Bighoss....

We are all looking for the "One Knife" that will do all the things we want to do better than any other
Knife that ever is or ever was....... I have been on that quest for most of my life and can only say,"I'am a workin' on it!!!.......I think I am getting closer if the knife is in my hands..... CMRickand I were doing comparisons between the 9, 20 and 21 yesterday and it was interesting.....we were in my neighbors bamboo grove, cutting culms that were two to three and a half inches in diameter.... The thin wall one year growth culms yielded better to the 9 and 21 and the older thicker walled stuff was easier felled by the 20...... As we all get used to the new tool I think the consensus will be in favor of the twenty, as it has a bit more weight and reach and damned good balance..... Thanks for trying to be objective...LOL....

Ethan

The One Knife concept really boils down to what we call in aviation Mission Profile. The same logic can be applied to boats. Folks see a boat they like and then try to adapt their mission profile to the boat. They get real unhappy real quick and the boat goes up for sale.

I have a gaggle of Becker knives and, when around the house, have the luxury of picking up the knife I feel best suit for the task. The BK5 slices and dices like nobody's business while I can do things with the BK2 that other knives would crawl up in their sheaths and cry like babies about.

The BK9, to me, is seems a bit more versatile as it handles lighter in the hand ... think flipping burgers or, as you taught me the test of any knife is: making a tent peg. The BK20, OTOH, is hefty yet extremely well balanced for lopping and chopping; not that the 9 cannot lop and chop - just that the 20 seems more purpose designed for those tasks. Every design criteria involves compromise and reducing the delta of compromise to mission profile functionality is a very worthy if not elusive goal of any designer - be it of a knife, truck, airplane or anything else.

The BK9 is not unlike a 3/4 ton (now called 2500 series) pick-up truck: stout, capable, strong, functional and versatile. A 3/4 ton truck isn't terribly unwieldy around town yet it can tow, haul, plow and get stuff done without suffering undue wear, tear or failure. Like the BK9, it's darned near a do it all truck. The 20 is more of the 3500 dually. Yes it can be driven around town and sure it's bigger and heavier than needed for many tasks but when big jobs, big trailers and big roads are in the mix - a 3500 dually really comes into its own. This is evident in what Ethan shared regarding the one-year bamboo versus the heavier walled more mature bamboo. If I were to own just one truck, it would be a 3/4 ton but if the mission profile more frequently called for heavier work - a 3500 dually would be the ticket. The BK20 is the 3500 dually - though a well handling, powerful and nimble for its ability 3500 dually.
 
Good point, Hoss. Good point.

So, salty, you're saying the 9 is a 25-06 (can be used varmints to elk, but only ideal on long-range antelopes and hogs),
whereas the 20 is a 300WSM bear/ elk rifle that could be employed for smaller stuff but won't do it right, so you'd want to have a 5.56 around for coyotes and down (perhaps a 16 or 24)?

I guess I like my 20 like I like my 7mm RM. but all- around I might be better served by a 6.5 Creedmoor or Swede. The King.
 
size for size, the Nessmuk pattern works well for me.

a multi-tool (folder), a fixed blade (choose!), and a small axe - ideally double bit, like the Council Tool Saddle axe, or perhaps the Hoffman as your choice dictates :D i'd probably add a larger knife like a khukri, esp the original Machax (mine also has the necker and small knife and a firesteel).

where two is one and one is none, having a selection of various sizes and goodness is always nice.

imho, any type of "axe" can outperform a given knife; i'm not talking one off chopping competitions but all day utility and efficiency.

it's a matter of smoothing it, not roughing it ...

but if you like carrying around big ass knives, go for it, the 9 and 20 won't do you wrong.
 
You know, I've never tried a nessmuk. I can see how they'd be useful, but they just never appealed to me.
Until I saw Andy's Fiddleback Forager.
That is a thing of beauty. Could make room in the stable for one of those.
 
Good point, Hoss. Good point.

So, salty, you're saying the 9 is a 25-06 (can be used varmints to elk, but only ideal on long-range antelopes and hogs),
whereas the 20 is a 300WSM bear/ elk rifle that could be employed for smaller stuff but won't do it right, so you'd want to have a 5.56 around for coyotes and down (perhaps a 16 or 24)?

I guess I like my 20 like I like my 7mm RM. but all- around I might be better served by a 6.5 Creedmoor or Swede. The King.

The .25-06 title goes to the BK5. It's fast and flat but punches above its weight.

The 20 is a .338 Winchester Magnum ... maybe even a .338 Lapua!

The 9 is like a .300 Win Mag ... a .30-06 on steroids and a serious do-it-all (heavy) caliber.

None of this eliminates the appropriateness of the Tweeners which are the 5.56 through .243 or even 7mm-08 class.

:D:)
 
Nessmuk? How about Locknessmuk?

IMG_9109.jpg
 
Since my 20 remains in the safe, I can't answer this. Why doesn't anybody compare the 20 to a machete? It certainly sounds like most describe it as doing the work of a short, heavy machete. So is it a short machete in reality?
 
Well, I was too busy trying not to dry out the fish to snap any pics, but I flipped and served salmon fillets with the 9 today.
It works just fine, too.
I gotta say - if flippin burgers is your knife thing, I prefer the 20 over the 9.
If Choppin giant annoying stuff out the way, I prefer the 20 over the 9.
But if I'm carrying it all day, and performing a multitude of tasks from scraping, to cutting, to chopping, to battoning, to working on dinner: The 9 is probably the better choice.

Get BOTH!!!
 
A long time ago I received a sage comment in regards to knives and it went something like this, "A knife ain't worth a darned unless it can make a PB&J sandwich."

That speaks volumes to the specialized nature of some knives' designs and to the basic needs we all have in knives. As much as the 20 is superior to the 9 in many areas, there is something to be said of the versatility of the BK9.
 
A long time ago I received a sage comment in regards to knives and it went something like this, "A knife ain't worth a darned unless it can make a PB&J sandwich."

That speaks volumes to the specialized nature of some knives' designs and to the basic needs we all have in knives. As much as the 20 is superior to the 9 in many areas, there is something to be said of the versatility of the BK9.
Someone needs to make this video! The BK-9 vs the 20 vs the 21 for making PB&J sammiches.
 
the BK20's smoother coating and flat grind should be preferable to the rough saber of the BK9 for spreading PB and J on bread, but now that my blades have been out in the woods for so long, I'd hesitate to use them for food purposes at all, I have cleaner blades for that.
 
the BK20's smoother coating and flat grind should be preferable to the rough saber of the BK9 for spreading PB and J on bread, but now that my blades have been out in the woods for so long, I'd hesitate to use them for food purposes at all, I have cleaner blades for that.

Clean blades? This guy over here. "Oh I'm a king. I'm too good for PB&J & tree sap & dirt & twigs & squirrel poop." Well la-de-da your highness. :p lol
 
my 9 is actually smooth coated... I've had it for a while though LOL! It's done some damage to some foliage along the years.
 
Back
Top