- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,238
I own four knives that, by all appearances, are identical except for the logo on the blade. One is stamped "Schrade USA XT2B" and another "Schrade XT2B" minus the "USA" stamp; the latter was made in China after Taylor acquired the Schrade name. The other two, both USA-made, are a Rigid and an Outdoor Life. The packaging on both suggests that they were made by United Cutlery, but I don't know the history there. Regardless, they look identical in every way. Why own four of what is essentially the same knife? I bought the Taylor-made (Chinese) version first, liked it a lot, and made a point to find a USA version. After buying a used one, I learned from various reviews and whatnot that the Rigid and Outdoor Life knives were the same. I have no idea what kind of steel was used for any of them, the USA Schrade included, but I don't really mind. In this case, the USA Schrade (and the other two USA-made "copies") came first, but the Chinese version made under Taylor's ownership is loyal to the original as far as I can tell. I feel that there must be some connection between Schrade and United Cutlery in terms of the manufacturing, just as there is with various Chinese knives sold under different brand names today.
That's not to say that there aren't some outright ripoffs out there, because there certainly are, but it seems to me that it comes down to owners of one manufacturer's products being far more upset over another manufacturer's "theft" of a design than the original manufacturer ever was. I'm a guitar guy, and popular/classic designs are copied all the time. This isn't an accident, but it's not necessarily malicious. It's when someone deliberately makes fakes (usually in China) with the original logo and copied design in an effort to knowingly deceive customers that the real trouble starts. Schrade is a household name among knife owners, and if they are deliberately and illegally copying another manufacturer's product, that's going to show up "on radar" pretty fast. If the original manufacturer knows about it and doesn't take issue or pursue legal action, I take that to mean that either 1) there is already an arrangement between the two companies or 2) the "original" manufacturer doesn't have a patent or exclusive license and knows they don't have grounds for legal action. We as consumers may never know.
It occurs to me that three of the five Schrade knives I own were made under Taylor's ownership of the brand, but I have yet to find any shortcomings as it pertains to their function as cutting tools. As collector pieces, they have no particular value. So, if the discriminating knife enthusiast can - for example - recite the specs of a CRK original and afford that knife, while the casual buyer opts for Schrade's much cheaper copy with no regard for the design's history or original specs, that's no different from countless other products.
That's not to say that there aren't some outright ripoffs out there, because there certainly are, but it seems to me that it comes down to owners of one manufacturer's products being far more upset over another manufacturer's "theft" of a design than the original manufacturer ever was. I'm a guitar guy, and popular/classic designs are copied all the time. This isn't an accident, but it's not necessarily malicious. It's when someone deliberately makes fakes (usually in China) with the original logo and copied design in an effort to knowingly deceive customers that the real trouble starts. Schrade is a household name among knife owners, and if they are deliberately and illegally copying another manufacturer's product, that's going to show up "on radar" pretty fast. If the original manufacturer knows about it and doesn't take issue or pursue legal action, I take that to mean that either 1) there is already an arrangement between the two companies or 2) the "original" manufacturer doesn't have a patent or exclusive license and knows they don't have grounds for legal action. We as consumers may never know.
It occurs to me that three of the five Schrade knives I own were made under Taylor's ownership of the brand, but I have yet to find any shortcomings as it pertains to their function as cutting tools. As collector pieces, they have no particular value. So, if the discriminating knife enthusiast can - for example - recite the specs of a CRK original and afford that knife, while the casual buyer opts for Schrade's much cheaper copy with no regard for the design's history or original specs, that's no different from countless other products.