Where does it say how "thin" the edge was??
According to an old thread, the Fallkniven A1 is ~0.060" behind the edge, ~20-dps (approximate, I know it's convex which should be stronger). http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/132281-What-s-the-blade-angle-on-the-A1
That is not a "thin bevel", that is a chopping edge and thicker than an ESEE Junglas, more like a Busse. Ever seen that happen to a Junglas chopping anything? What about a Busse? At 0.06", that should not have happened.
Exactly. Furthermore, you can plainly see from the photo how thick the edge grind really is, and how wide the chunks that chipped were at the base: I would not consider that a thin grind... I've handled the A-1 and I found the grind too thick for my taste. The Odin I had was sharper it seemed to me (never really used it). Too bad the sheath scratched the hell out of mine, and kept doing it even after much work to solve the issue...
Fallknivens have been chipping for years if not decades... Type "chipping and Fallknivens", and see the dozens, if not hundreds, of threads on many websites on this very issue... I actually use these search terms as a great way to find all sorts of new and peculiar knife-related forums and websites while doing this, thus demonstrating the observation is universal... Find obscure new places and have fun!
I don't buy the "bad layer to sharpen off" either: Most people when resharpening will not match the original profile, a complicated task especially on the convex edges present here, where it is much easier to open up the final angle than to actually restore the original profile: Well yes, a blunter edge will "chip less", and thus be proclaimed to have "gone through" the "bad" metal... In a way it is true the problem can be alleviated, if the knife is duller, yet still seems sharper from polishing...
I've never had much faith in super steels anyway...
Gaston