The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I've bought 11 cold steel knives in the past month and all have had outstanding fit and finish thats not including some of my friends knives and some I have held in stores and havent seen one flaw yet thats pretty darn good very impressed.
Disinformation? So, CS uses steels as good as ZT or many Spdies? The CS knives I held in my hand don't generally hold up to what I see in Spyderco or ZT as far as quality build and fit/finish.
Of course some of this is a matter of taste and opinion. I'm not saying anyone shouldn't buy CS just that IMO (take it or leave it) they are not as high quality as some other knives. They are as good as SOG,CRKT,and Ontario which are all companies that make good knives but IMO (again, yours may differ and that's OK) Benchmade, Spyderco, and ZT are generally making better knives.
You may disagree, but that doesn't mean i'm spreading disinformation. It's a fact that the companies I mentioned use better materials. Whether or not you like or need the more expensive materials is for the buyer to decide. I have no doubt there are a lot of people who have gotten a lot of good use out of CS knives but my point wasn't that they are poorly built knives just not as good as some other brands.
Either way, I'm done discussing this because apparently people can't have people disagree with them without getting butthurt.
I don't recall saying CS knives were junk. I said they don't use as good of materials as other brands. Most major knife makers make knives that will last a long time. Durability was never something I said was an issue for CS. My main issues are that they use cheaper materials (not in all knives, but most) and they styling of most of their knives looks like they are marketing to the 15 year old ninja.Interesting.....
This is a old, well used Cold Steel Recon 1 form 1995... That's 18 years old and it still works great and has no blade play....
![]()
![]()
![]()
My main issues are that they use cheaper materials
As I said earlier, it's up to each person to decide if the premium materials are worth it. I think better steel is good because it will hold an edge longer and some are more durable for hard use. I'm not knocking CS for making bad knives, the steel they use isn't super cheap garbage or anything like that but it's not top of the line either.Now, assuming I wasn't just a collector who wanted the most expensive knives, and was just looking for something I could get good use out of...my view is that if the cheaper materials are gonna hold up for 18 years under "well used" conditions, I personally couldn't justify paying for more expensive materials when clearly the cheaper materials are more than sufficient.
As for aesthetics, well, to each his own and all in that particular area.
My point is if you just look at the basic fit, finish and materials CS are not as nice as some others.
Ok people I don't understand the hate of cold steel knives they are true work horses that don't fail. But really great fit and finish. Your crazy Teflon coating sucks it comes of after little use. If you say other wise you are lying. So top quality fit and finish no. Don't church them up either. Good work knives they are but outstanding f&f they are not. I have one and love it but it is not the nicest, smoothest , or sexiest. But it does well at getting the job done.