- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 3,195
Here are my thoughts:
Firstly this is a classic case of trial without jury. This test is only valid if Chris Reeve or someone from their company is part of the test and can sign-off on the knife first. Having the maker and designer of a competitive knife being the jury of another person's design is not an impartial test.
Secondly, I would say for starters the impact test should come after the weight-hang test, or the weight hang test is invalid. Any person can see the second weight hang test will be compromised by spine whacking the heck out of the knife first.
Thirdly, some words about being a positive member of a community: Having a offshore knifemaker like Cold Steel pit itself against another respected knifemaker's product, in a test contrived to disparage the hardworking USA knifemaker is just poor taste, regardless of the subject of the attack. No amount of back-tracking, apologizing , or justifications, or stupid "we didn't want to do this, but the fans made us" type idiotspeak in the video can make up for the fact that it was done. All of the people involved in these sorts of one-sided videos, if directly representing their own designs or employed by a specific maker, are 1st rate douche-bags. I don't really care if it's Spyderco, or Benchmade, or anyone else under attack. The competing maker should be invited to the test session out of respect. You would not see Chris Reeve doing this sort of test of some Andrew Demko design, because he isn't a douche.
Coldsteel has lost any future business I might have sent their way, but I tend not to gravitate towards junk made in sweatshops anyways.
Firstly this is a classic case of trial without jury. This test is only valid if Chris Reeve or someone from their company is part of the test and can sign-off on the knife first. Having the maker and designer of a competitive knife being the jury of another person's design is not an impartial test.
Secondly, I would say for starters the impact test should come after the weight-hang test, or the weight hang test is invalid. Any person can see the second weight hang test will be compromised by spine whacking the heck out of the knife first.
Thirdly, some words about being a positive member of a community: Having a offshore knifemaker like Cold Steel pit itself against another respected knifemaker's product, in a test contrived to disparage the hardworking USA knifemaker is just poor taste, regardless of the subject of the attack. No amount of back-tracking, apologizing , or justifications, or stupid "we didn't want to do this, but the fans made us" type idiotspeak in the video can make up for the fact that it was done. All of the people involved in these sorts of one-sided videos, if directly representing their own designs or employed by a specific maker, are 1st rate douche-bags. I don't really care if it's Spyderco, or Benchmade, or anyone else under attack. The competing maker should be invited to the test session out of respect. You would not see Chris Reeve doing this sort of test of some Andrew Demko design, because he isn't a douche.
Coldsteel has lost any future business I might have sent their way, but I tend not to gravitate towards junk made in sweatshops anyways.