Cliff Stamp
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 5, 1998
- Messages
- 17,562
Yeah, plus I would think for that type of traditional knife I would assume it would be multi-tasking. I don't imagine those guys carried a few braces of cutlery for various tasks, I would assume that one knife would get carried over a very broad spectrum of tasks, including ones that would be damaging.knifetester said:Having glanced of bones a number of times, counters, pots, plates, etc, I think the toughness of the slightly softer steel and ease of sharpening can be an asset under certain situations.
No, they look solid though and his approach to knifemaking as you described is near ideal.Have you used any of Chudzinski's knives?
[vs Alvin's]
Yeah, Alvin's is a very focused design, you could snap it very easily with almost insignificant lateral strain or twisting. There are a lot of approaches to knifemaking which are solid and coherent, they just have different goals in mind. For the user it is most important if the maker is clean in what he is trying to do and do it in a sensible way....in regards to overall performance.
For example Reeve took a similar approach with his S30V in the Green Beret, or at least it sounds like it to Chudzinski's as he left his S30V soft, however even when soft S30V doesn't machine well and now you are left with a steel which is hard to grind and tends to form a heavy burr. It is also still brittle at that hardness and chips readily.
In contrast a carbon or spring steel would grind much easier, would not produce the floppy burr and be much tougher and more ductile.
-Cliff