I guess it deserves it's own thread but I wonder what aspects would cause you guys to pass on an otherwise "perfect" piece?
1. Bead blasted blades-have a few, but don't want any more.
2. Brass or nickel silver fittings.
3. Poor transition from blade to handle.
4. Slab handles without a guard or bolster on anything but an inexpensive user.
5. Handles without a mechanical bond-pin or bolt or threaded tang.
6. Aesthetically unappealing engraving or handle sculpting/carving-better to be unadorned.
7. "fishhooks" on handrubbed satin finishes.
8. The afformentioned spanish notches.
9. The afformentioned, dreaded "raised choil".
10. C or D guards that don't work with the piece.
11. Bad blade to handle ratio. If it has a 5" blade, I prefer a 4 1/4" handle on a fixed blade. On a folder, handle anything more than 1" longer than the blade is TOO long.
12. Unimaginative or poorly executed damascus patterns, bad welds, cold shunts, glaring pattern deviation in a conspicuous location.
13. Giraffe Bone, oosik(normally),ivory, boring wood, cracked anything; specifically pearl.
14. Uncentered blades in folders, the detent not matching the ball, so the blade point can stick up without interference. Front to back play.
15. Slotted(without filework) or especially phillips screw construction.
16. Goofy looking blades without a clear purpose.
17. Loveless style blades that seek to "interpret" rather than shooting for the brass ring, and doing the correct elements-lugged guard on subhilts, proper shape, tapered tang, deep hollow grinds....
Lastly, not that I would not buy the knife for this reason, but I TRULY dislike kydex sheaths. On Dozier and Krein knives, I get Kenny Rowe to make leather sheaths for me. Kydex scratches the hell out of a blades' finish.
Best Regards,
STeven Garsson