I commented on the last thread, but when I pressed enter it was already closed--so I'm glad this one was started

An edge can certainly encur damage when struck against harder materials, but if the company wont warranty in these circumstances, they need to make their customers aware of it. I think it's silly that some people feel it's important to chop with proper technique, or avoid harder woods. Is this smart? Sure! But it has nothing to do with a company's warranty. Any types of wood they want you to avoid need to be explicitly stated in the warranty, if they want to include it. Customers cannot read minds, and there's no reason to assume that their warranty is conditional, when so many other companies warranties' are not. If a company claims to warranty something and makes no mention of specific technique/lumber they will not warranty chopping through, then they have no right to claim it after the fact. This is why stating things clearly is so important--if BRKT failed to, they have no one to blame but themselves when some one damages a knife, using it for the purpose that THEY put forth on their website. And that aside, this shouldn't even be an issue IMO. The Golok is THICKER than my 1311, and scrapyard will warranty my 1311 chopping through ANY wood I choose, so why wouldn't BRKT do the same? By not warrantying(sp?) the damage, it's like their either saying their product is inferior, or they just don't care about their customers. It's just disturbing that they would show such disregard for a legitimate claim.