screened porch
Basic Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 18,665
I like my Jarvenpaa kauhavaleinen puukko from the allergic recreationist website.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Several years ago a forum member with a Finnish background posted this: ‘Puukko’ is a Finnish term. It’s a derivative of ‘puu’ which means wood. A puukko is, first and foremost, a wood carving tool (we have a special term for that, ‘vuoleminen’, the root verb being ‘vuolla’, which comes close to whittling or wood carving, but denotes specifically the use of the blade for push-cuts, not slicing or slashing). Other ‘necessary’ uses of a puukko have to do with fishing and hunting, i.e., scaling, skinning, filleting, and other such tasks in preparing fish and game. Skilled users do about everything with a puukko, though. Once it was thought that a boy really doesn’t need other purchased toys; after he gets a puukko, he’ll make everything else with it. This is no joke! In the 50’s, schoolboys were (at some places) forbidden to use the puukko during wood-carving lessons, because they wouldn’t otherwise learn to use other tools, like planes, saws and chisels. Now the situation is, of course, quite different. Many Finns do not learn to use the puukko properly, though some kind of renaissance may be discernable here (there’s even a special ‘vuolukirja’, whittling book, by Joel Nokelainen 1996, but I think, only in Finnish).
The puukko has developed to remarkable functional simplicity during generations of hard, straightforward use by ordinary people. It is a compromise, a multi-tool, if you like, with nothing inessential. That explains some of its characteristic features. The blade, for instance, is typically only a hand width in length, or a bit less. A longer blade would hamper its performance in whittling, etc. control is better with a shorter one (for fine work, such as countersinking a hole, the puukko is grasped by the blade and the thumb may be used as a ‘backstop’. But because it is not a ‘pure’ wood carving tool, too short won’t do. Similar explanations could be given for the relatively pointy point (remember the hole?), the (usually) straight back (with absolutely no false-edge or swedge), the wedgelike grind, the relatively thin blade, the smooth guardless handle (often called the head), made traditionally of wood, mostly birch, or of birch bark, etc. There are, of course, exceptions, and specialization is taking place here, too. But most of the recent developments in puukko may be more market-driven than purely function. For instance, the recent proliferation of finger-guards comes solely from legislative (consumer protective) demands of USA. A traditional puukko does not need them, as it is not meant for stabbing (though they were used for that too by the ‘puukkojunkkarit’, a group of Finnish outlaws at the Kauhava region quite a few decades ago).
The carry system, in Finnish ‘tuppi’, is traditionally great. It’s not a quick-draw or concealment item or anything like that, but protects the puukko (and its owner) well, keeps it securely in place, does not hamper sitting, etc., and is aesthetically pleasing (the puukko is often called ‘tuppiroska’, sheath-litter, as it were and that could, I guess, reflect the high esteem that traditional makers have had for the sheath). But everyone does not know anymore how to make a proper tuppi (or does not have the time/financial means for that). About the grind. Not every puukko has a high saber grind (or ‘wide flat Scandinavian grind’, as somebody said), and not every puukko lacks a secondary bevel, though typically they do. Sharpening the whole flat sides every time would wear the blade down quickly (this actually happens – there are many puukkos around that resemble only faintly what they were as new), though for ‘vuoleminen’ you do need a very acute angle (about 15/30 degrees). In addition, there are (new) puukkos with a secondary grind as well as some with a convex grind (notably, the Lapinleuku, the traditional tool of reindeer-owners). About the thickness, yes, puukko blades tend to be relatively thin (and not very wide, either, and they do not have a full tang, which I have often grumbled myself). This relates again to its primary functions. It’s not convenient to ‘vuolla’ or to fillet with a thick blade, and you do not, typically, chop or pry with a puukko (for chopping we use the axe and for prying the other guy’s tools).
Enzo Nordic in O1...
![]()
I see these great looking Puukko knives and am thinking about getting one. I've been looking at the Kellam Knives, but what else should I consider?
Thanks for the help.
That knife right there is a perfect example Christian, I absolutely love the blade and handle shape of it! :thumbup:Fair enough. I'm going to go ahead and suggest the Tommi. It's iconic -- one of the most widely reproduced puukko designs.
![]()
- Christian
You can buy a blade and mount it on your own. It may not turn out as lovely as a professional knife maker's product, but it will be uniquely yours.
Tommi-puukko - A design inspired and named after an Englishman. Just saying![]()
I really wish I'd never laid eyes on this knife..........I must have one!!!!!!!!
WW!!!!!!!!!!!
Kellam sells a nice selection of knives, but does not make knives. Pretty much everything they sell can be purchased directly from the maker, less Kellam's markup
- Wolf Pack; Puukko; Wolverine Made by Ahti
-KP Line: Made by Kainuun Puukko of Finland. VK stamped ones are made by Veijo Käpylä (the current smith) AK and OK stamped ones should be the last ones made by the Kemppainen brothers, the previous owners.
-R Line: made by Roselli Oy.
-J line: made by Iisakki Järvenpää Oy.
-M Line: made by Janne Marttiini Oy.
-AK Line: made by Altti Kankaanpää, father of Pauli and now retired, though still forging sometimes.
-Historical Knives, Finnish Knives: made by Antti Mäkinen, grandson of Yrjö Puronvarsi.
-KT Line: made by Wood Jewel on design of Kauko Raatiniemi, owner of Wood Jewel itself. Seems that puukkos and leukus are made by Kauko and his son Tuomas, while the others are made by other men.
-Other Lines
-HM Line: made by Harri Merimaa of WoodsKnife wth Lauri blades
-YP Line: made by Antti Mäkinen (1° and 3°),
Kuronen Puukko (2°), Paaso Puukot Oy (4°)
-Kullervo: made by Veikko Hakkarainen of Tapio
-S Line: made by Finman
-Ranger Puukko: made by Fiskars
-Small Knives: various souvenir puukkos made by Paaso, Lappi Tuottet and Lauri Tuottet
That knife right there is a perfect example Christian, I absolutely love the blade and handle shape of it! :thumbup:
Distilled perfection!
I see these great looking Puukko knives and am thinking about getting one. I'm trying to figure out what is what when it comes to the Puukko. I have a Mora, which I guess is a modernized version of the Puukko, but I'd like something a little more traditional or nicer.... or both. I've been looking at the Kellam Knives, but what else should I consider? I plan to use it as a camping/hunting knife and don't want anything longer than 4" in the blade.
Thanks for the help.
Thanks Duane. I agree. I saw my first Tommi maybe a dozen years ago and it took me nearly that long to pull the trigger and order one. I even ordered a puukko that was sort of like a Tommi. It didn't help. All I did was make me want a Tommi even more. I could've saved myself time and money if I had just bought the knife I wanted in the first place.
- Christian
I really wish I'd never laid eyes on this knife..........I must have one!!!!!!!!