IMO one bonds with a knife--in the unique way that brings most of us here eventually-- not only by how it feels IN your hand but by the way you FEEL when it is in your hand.
I enjoy Emersons because they're 'cut a little rougher.' Figuratively, not necessarily literally...
I once posted in a similar thread:
When new, Emersons are the fussiest, most fickle knives I know of as a brand. It's like bringing a new puppy home and wondering where it's going to pee. I expect it and it's part of the quirky charm of a great line of knives.
Only with an incoming Emerson will I tolerate an off-center blade, grit in the pivot, some remnants of the G-10 grind that need to be wiped from the handle still, right out of the box. Any other brand would go right back to the dealer.
Always the "tuning in" for a new Emerson---Loosen her up in places, tighten her down in others....loosen the whole thing; tighten it all back down. Play with the pivot for a while. Suddenly it's perfect. And stays that way.
I like chisel edges because I like a very sharp blade. No steel takes the stone or strop like Emerson 154, IMO. Those who 'waaaaahh' about the chisel seem to be the same ones who claim a tanto blade makes for a bad EDC. Huh??? Ya freakin' carrot cutters.....
If more first time Emerson buyers were made aware of the Emerson 'learning curve' and that many of them will require a break-in period, perhaps even involving the dismantling or loose-up/retighten of the knife, there wouldn't be nearly so many haters. Patience with or ignorance of a break in requirement may be the biggest factor here.
I believe there would be a lot more satisfaction with Emersons out there if people realize what a gem they would have with a minimum of 'polishing.'
Best of all though, the fact that I can buy two Emersons for every Sebenza is simply, to me, a God-given situation. Thank you Lord and Ernie.