- Joined
- Jun 16, 2003
- Messages
- 20,207
I myself find this thread odd, in that the OP has posted numerous threads about the "evils" of ebay. Making up names like eprey, etc. Questioning a lack of oversight of fakes, counterfeits, stolen merchandise, etc. Suddenly, when there seems to be someone at least trying to operate on the up and up - or meet state/local requirements; now it's a crime too.
After all the knocks, comments, threads, and conspiracy theories - the OP still uses ebay regularly. What's UP with that?????
I cannot claim pride of authorship for "ePrey." Perhaps I should have used the Bladeforums traditional "Evilbay."
I have, in other threads, questioned the proliferation of fakes and counterfeits and, implicitly, eBay's claim that: "We don't allow replicas, counterfeit items, or unauthorized copies to be listed on eBay. " Do you seriously believe that eBay's claim is accurate? If so, you might want to read from: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/796442-Spyderco-Fakes-amp-Knock-Offs-Info The current RICO lawsuit will perhaps shed more light on the massive counterfeit market in which eBay is the major, but hardly the exclusive, player.
I did not accuse anyone in this thread of a crime. I pointed out that eBay and the seller have, collectively, required me to give my telephone number to the seller, via eBay, as a condition of sale after the auction was won - attempting to change the deal after it was closed. I pointed out that eBay and the Seller have given inconsistent reasons for that requirement and that eBay has made inconsistent claims about who "required the number." If you find it "odd" to be jerked around with inconsistent stories, feel free.
It is suggested that state/local requirements drive the post-contract "requirement" of a telephone number for a sale of a knife. I have reviewed the applicable regulations in the State of Illinois, but I can't find such a requirement for a salwe by a pawnshop. However, I if I had been told that story in the first place instead of the other, inconsistent stories, my reaction would probably been otherwise. I was never told that, instead I got the three explanations repeatedly recorded above and ignored.
I do not believe there is a "conspiracy" either in the situation that I described in this thread or in eBay's facilitation of sale of counterfeit goods. I believe what I described in this thread is driven by dishonesty and incompetence rather than a conspiracy. I believe that eBay's role in the counterfeit goods market is driven by greed. No conspiracy is needed, merely an understanding that if you bring counterfeit goos to the eBay marketplace you will most likely be able to sell them there, notwithstanding ""We don't allow replicas, counterfeit items, or unauthorized copies to be listed on eBay. "
I use eBay because it is the only effective marketplace for the old knives that I collect.
http://www.businessinsider.com/ebay-admits-it-banned-a-whistleblower-2014-11
http://www.laweekly.com/news/how-eb...ustry-the-counterfeit-products-market-5261019
http://postandparcel.info/67371/news/ebay-and-paypal-hit-with-lawsuit-over-counterfeit-goods/
http://www.lawyersandsettlements.co...ay-faces-rico-lawsuit-20856.html#.Vhfp0PlVhBc