Tom is right.
Every time I have raised this very issue on the AKTI forum I hear crickets chirping.
In fairness to the manufacturers, they have to choose their battles. California was a huge victory re changing the statute. Why won't they do it in New York? Maybe because their lawyers tell them they won't win -- who knows. Look at the WSJ article and the culture around NYC, and you see lots of people (inlcuding judges and LEOs) who equate knives with weapons. And the advertisers don't help.
The big problem, in my opinion, is that so many folks have gotten away from the concept of knife as tool because fewer and fewer people need a sturdy a knife as a tool as they become more and more depnedent on assisted living, at least where I live.
I can get by with a small SAK most of the time, so I do, but a sebenza would be safer and better for some of the tasks I use it for.
Start arguing for waved tantos and assisted openers, though, and you risk opening up a can of worms. What distinguishes them from the gravity knives and the switchblades that the legislature in fact banned? I have made the arguments, and got some pretty blank looks -- distinctions without a difference is the phrase that comes to mind.
As with so many things, it's a cultural issue at its core. For many of us, we adhere to principles of self reliance that compel us to be well equipped to take care of ourselves. Others are perfectly willing to compromise these same principles in the interest of cooperative living and idealistic community standards.
It's all open to debate, but we self-reliant types are just as vulnerable to idealism as anyone else. And the reality in New York is that, in my experience, the government doesn't want you walking around armed. There are consequences for ignoring that.
But the PIZZA is good, so we have that going for us.
My 2 cents.