These days I have to say its Randall.
They are the only ones I know of to offer big military-style fixed blades with deep hollow grinds and 0.5 mm thin edge bevel tops, without any of that convexing stuff...
Another plus is they are practically the only ones to offer forged stainless 440B (supposedly going on C on some batches)... These two factors makes them practically without competition, as 440C is my first choice of steel, and the thin edges are plenty strong enough, with the resulting small narrow bevels making them easy to sharpen to 10° per side for decades on end. (Only my 20 year out of production Al Mar Special Warfare combines similar attributes, but in Aus-6 (8?) and without the forging)
I hate Randall's uneven "swirly" finishes, symmetry issues and even sometimes untrue blade surfaces (although correctly centered primary bevels, but otherwise the roughest factory blades I know of, despite what most photos look like)...
I love far more my Vaugh Neeley SA9 and its "formal" absolute perfection (Randalls look made in the 13th century in comparison), but with 1.8 mm wide edge bevels, it took me weeks to take the Neeley's bevels well below 15° per side (a barely possible endeavor), and considering how hard it would be to use and then bring back to par, with that thick an edge base and such tall bevels, I think I'm only throwing away that work when the sky is falling...
Gaston
They are the only ones I know of to offer big military-style fixed blades with deep hollow grinds and 0.5 mm thin edge bevel tops, without any of that convexing stuff...
Another plus is they are practically the only ones to offer forged stainless 440B (supposedly going on C on some batches)... These two factors makes them practically without competition, as 440C is my first choice of steel, and the thin edges are plenty strong enough, with the resulting small narrow bevels making them easy to sharpen to 10° per side for decades on end. (Only my 20 year out of production Al Mar Special Warfare combines similar attributes, but in Aus-6 (8?) and without the forging)
I hate Randall's uneven "swirly" finishes, symmetry issues and even sometimes untrue blade surfaces (although correctly centered primary bevels, but otherwise the roughest factory blades I know of, despite what most photos look like)...
I love far more my Vaugh Neeley SA9 and its "formal" absolute perfection (Randalls look made in the 13th century in comparison), but with 1.8 mm wide edge bevels, it took me weeks to take the Neeley's bevels well below 15° per side (a barely possible endeavor), and considering how hard it would be to use and then bring back to par, with that thick an edge base and such tall bevels, I think I'm only throwing away that work when the sky is falling...
Gaston