Fighting windmills(or the futility of fighting my issues)......

Why not knock it all off and talk knives. The good, the bad, and the ugly of KNIVES. Stop talking about each other. I don't come to this forum section for the BS. I am here for the knives.

Aha! Then why are you here now? Why do you care enough to post on this? Rhetorical questions of course, just food for thought.

Yes we all believe in lady knife, but we are jostling around like mortals. We can't help ourselves. Knife folk are what they are and we need to accept each other's warts as well as each other's works.
 
Why not knock it all off and talk knives. The good, the bad, and the ugly of KNIVES. Stop talking about each other. I don't come to this forum section for the BS. I am here for the knives.

Bill does that mean you don't want me to be president :)
 
As Peter indicated, Google considers BFC a threat and made the Forums inaccessible for me yesterday, have made it here via MSN....up to work at 3:30 am yesterday and was a bit punchy by the time I got home.

I have a new job that allows me 15 hours LESS free time compared to the previous job. I averaged 4 hours a day on BFC while at that job, 2 hours at work, 2 hours at home.....we don't have kids, so my time is often my own....now, I average about 1-2 hours a day on BFC....and would like that time to be productive.

Thanks to most everyone for chiming in. The catalyst for this thread was primarily my telephone discussion with Coop, and two secondary threads recently, Lorien's Damascarbotanium thread and David Darom's thread on Italian maker Antonio Fogarizzu. In all three cases, I offered up opinions that were imo, on track. In Coop's case, he felt I was belittling him personally. In Lorien's case, he felt I was personally attacking him, and should have offered up specific areas to improve upon. In the Italian case, I pointed out specific areas of concern,(fat handle, skinny shortish blade), and no one seemed to seriously consider this as a problem.

This is an issue for myself in the long run, and certainly an issue in the short term for those feeling that they are being denigrated. I know what I am looking at (but not always saying, I called the Moss designed knife 2x a barong, Lorien called me ba-wrong(punny, eh?).....it is correctly termed a bolo, and stand by my design statements). So if I can't get you to see it the way that I see it, and my words are insufficient for you to understand my point.....it is a futile exercise...for both of us/all concerned.

As with collecting various knives, participation on a forum is largely one of perception. What you like may not be what others like and what you find unappealing may appeal to others. It doesnt mean either party is wrong, it means they have different perceptions on what they like and how they participate. How a maker makes a knife or a poster participates in a forum setting is entirely dependant on their interpretation of what is before them.

Most everything in life has a niche, a place, a purpose. A maker, collector, a user and a forum participant all must make judgement calls based on the interpretation of their interests. It doesnt mean that when one finds a blade or topic that doesnt conform to his preferred interest that he must critique and demean the effort. It means that one should focus on the things that interest them and ignore the things they don't.

Karda, your posts were interesting and informative to me. My last meltdown resulted in you pouncing on me when I was on the ropes, as Lorien stated. You started out rational and then got just plain mean and bitter, and left me with two thoughts of note.....

1) You are not entirely wrong, and I should consider your words.

2) JUST like me, you don't know when to shut up. You last volley of words in the meltdown in two distinct threads left me with a big FU...as you were hunting/hounding me. If you had just left it with the zen calming/peaceful stuff, I would have considered just about ALL you say. Physician, heal thine self.

The last volley between you, Roger and Joseph reveals how inappropriate you can be and how little you can see it....not so different from me at times.

Steven,

I will be posting pictures soon of some Loveless style knives. I will be applying for membership in the Knifemakers Guild.I look forward to your comments.We will disagree on some points and that will great.

Best Regards Rick

Thanks, Rick....would love to be of some service, appreciate your posting!

Randy Morgan had a stroke a few years back and didn't do much posting after that....he did/does a lot of fishing. Vietnam Veteran, big guy, wore loud ass Hawaiian shirts, I knew him for years as a person before I posted on BladeForums. Loved him back then, still do. ALWAYS fair, not above telling me or anyone else that he thought they were full of BS....then we laughed.

....I find your involvement in this thread to be unnecessarily polarizing. I like your tone most of the time, but I think you could really help to simmer things down here by bowing out of this one.

Lorien, you have amazing class.....something not many would say about me. Thanks for posting in this thread. I am sorry that you don't see where I am coming from, but it doesn't make EITHER one of us wrong, and it hasn't in the past. You think you suffered more abuse than anyone, but that delightful honor goes to a fair bunch of other people including our own David Mullin(s)? 2knife....who seems to be in good shape, regardless of the insults slinged.

No matter who we are on this forum (and I am glad I am a nobody), we are a NOTHING to the grand scheme of things to custom knife collecting over the course of human history. If every regular to this forum was vaporized with their collections tomorrow, we would have lost some great knowledgeable people and some great knives. However custom knifemaking will go on, and new collectors/makers will take their place. Something I think we should all be able to keep in mind when finding ourselves feeling superior to others. Your opinion is no better than mine, it is just different- no matter how many thousands of dollars each knife you own is or isn't worth. Nor does who you know make your opinion more valid. Bill Bagwell's opinions on Bowies may have more historical fact and research behind them than mine does- but it does not mean he knows what works best for me, both of our opinions are valid for ourselves within the context of WHY we formed our opinions. (for the record I've never held a Bagwell, talked to the man, or have any true opinion of what I think of his opinions as I am not much of a bowie guy- just a name to throw out that carries a lot more clout than mine does).

I am kind of sick of the "take my ball and go home" attitude that seems to be growing lately. If you see a deficiency in something- do what you can to fix it, and understand that others may not see the deficiency as you do. Accept it and move on. Don't like what somebody says- then ignore them! It shouldn't need to be said to adults, but you do not need to reply to everything that pisses you off in life! I've avoided most conflicts in life by understanding when something really didn't matter, and ignoring those not worth my time. I love BladeForums, the people within, and the atmosphere here. I've electronically met some great people, and as such try to be one of the good guys for others- as my online persona is still my persona and I hold myself accountable to it. I'm not perfect- I have once called out a member that I was sick of, said my piece and moved on. I do kind of regret it as I do not like acting like that, but the other member was getting mighty big in his britches and sticking his nose where it wasn't wanted just to be a jackass, and I was sick of how it made the forum look in my view- bullying isn't something I like to put up with if I perceive it as such.

I think that part of the conflict in this forum is the overwhelming feel of Custom Collector Forum moreso than just the Custom forum. In my perception many arguments are based on future projections of profit/collectability/desireable traits for the future. Why not discuss the knife itself?!? OR how about discussing desirability rather than value? The Collector aspect can drive people away as there are a few major collectors here, yet they are the overwhelming voice on this forum, complete with back history with each other, positive and negative. I know that when I started visiting this forum it seemed that one almost had to pick a side to stand on- alienating some posters as a result. I know that it had kept me from giving my opinion, just based on hostility that others give each other here. THIS THREAD SHOWS THAT CLEARLY AND I THINK THIS NEEDS TO STOP- IT IS THE FACTOR THAT I FEEL IS CAUSING THE MOST EROSION OF THE QUALITY OF THE FORUM! WE ALL LOVE KNIVES- LETS START SHOWING WHY, GROW THE HELL UP AND REALIZE THERE IS AN ENTIRE WORLD WATCHING- NOT JUST THOSE PARTICIPATING.

1. Appreciate the time it took you to post that.

2. The history of American custom knifemaking/collecting is new/unwritten. Each of us is a part of it, I had hoped to illustrate that in my first post. Take that as you will. Human history is one thing....our thing certainly fits within it, but is another thing to some degree.

3. It takes a very strong personality and willpower to actively collect and order custom knives.....in my EXPERIENCE, some of the "biggest" collectors have some of the biggest egos, are the loudest people and have the strongest opinions of anyone else in the room. That this comes out on the Custom Knife s/f of BFC should neither be a surprise nor a problem. It should be an aspect.....and the sooner beginning collectors and makers accept this, the more likely it will be that they have "the stuff" to be a long-term maker or collector....will unapologetically state that is a big aspect of my agenda.

Why not knock it all off and talk knives. The good, the bad, and the ugly of KNIVES. Stop talking about each other. I don't come to this forum section for the BS. I am here for the knives.

Bill....how you doing, buddy?

With customs, it's about the person AND the knives. Impossible to divide Loveless the man from his work....they are one and the same, and that always creates debate. Same as D.E Henry....not one collector or knife aficionado can say anything about his creamy satin finishes and overall superior designs than "WOW", but ask them about the man? Everyone has an opinion.

Me? I would rather talk about the knives alone, as they are quite interesting, but when you say something bad about a maker's knife, well in some cases, you just insulted their children. Said it before, believe it....isn't about me, isn't about you....it is about US. With analyzing the US in the scenario, WE might benefit if I didn't post a negative position unless I have the time to fully explore it, explain it and defend it.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Last edited:
So if I can't get you to see it the way that I see it, and my words are insufficient for you to understand my point.....it is a futile exercise...for both of us.

Please consider the following possibility. Maybe you do get a lot of people to see (at least some) things the way you see them and your words are perfectly sufficient for many folks to understand your point . . . but folks who agree with something just don't tend to post as often "yeah - you're right!" as folks tend to post when they disagree with something. Perhaps you just need more faith in Nixon's Silent Majority. :D

For example . . . I can see why that the particular blade in question may be considered to be bolo-esque. I see other blades like that, and I don't care for them, but I never made the connection before with bolos which I also do not care for. Like a bolo, the blade seems to widen further from the handle toward the tip. Now a bolo may be and probably is very useful for cutting through bamboo in the jungles of the Phillipines. And if I ever find myself there, then perhaps I will reconsider my opinion. But in the meantime, I personally have no use or affinity for bolos or machetes, and I do not see any point is trying to "modernize" them.
 
Good post. It took a LONG time to format and write, and it made a difference.

I feel involved in this thread--but not responsible. That's STeven's area to manage.

That you would give reserved props to Lorien and an admission that some of Karda's thoughts may be worthy of digestion, shows good balance to me. That was explained clearly.

In the past (and above) I've noted you have clarity in your writing beyond average. Giving the balance is not an obligation, but it's a responsibility, if you wish to display more weight to your words.

I appreciate this thread. Thank you Steve.

Jim
 
Lorien, you have amazing class.....something not many would say about me. Thanks for posting in this thread. I am sorry that you don't see where I am coming from, but it doesn't make EITHER one of us wrong, and it hasn't in the past.

the thing that bothers me about your approach to providing feedback is your failure to fully explain where you're coming from. I'm all for 'enigmatic' when it comes to the Mona Lisa, but in communication, (especially the internet) ideas must be presented clearly if they're going to be of much use. None of us are mind readers.

When you make a quick jab without enough explanation as to why you are saying what you are saying, I'm left with 'WTF'? Hence my pm after your second post in my thread, which you didn't answer, therefore elevating that situaton beyond where it needed to be.

I was most impressed awhile back when you took the time to call and ask where I was coming from with a post I made regarding movie knives, before posting your view on my view. I changed my post because I discovered another side to the story that I hadn't considered, realizing my statement was more 'absolute' than it should have been, (an area to improve on for me, which I've been working on). You could have jumped on the post and thrashed me instead, so I thought the phone call was a big improvement. It gave me a chance to learn something instead of getting my hackles up, and when that happens there ain't much room left for learning.
And for gods' sake, if you're going to make a statement comparing knives to knives, make sure you get your terminology right! When you didn't do that in my other thread, it made your comment all the more flippant and irritating.

I can take constructive criticism, ridicule even in some cases, but I must know why.
ENFJ, fyi
 
the thing that bothers me about your approach to providing feedback is your failure to fully explain where you're coming from. I'm all for 'enigmatic' when it comes to the Mona Lisa, but in communication, (especially the internet) ideas must be presented clearly if they're going to be of much use. None of us are mind readers.

When you make a quick jab without enough explanation as to why you are saying what you are saying, I'm left with 'WTF'? Hence my pm after your second post in my thread, which you didn't answer, therefore elevating that situaton beyond where it needed to be.
ENFJ, fyi

I didn't get your PM, otherwise I would have answered it.

I didn't spell out everything in your thread because I ASSume after 6+ years on BladeForums, writing in a magazine, designing a bunch of knives, up to and including your gifted "eye" for minutiae vis a vis bicycles that you "get it" and are simply being willfully obstinate in ignoring things that are right in front of you....without considering...

Your experiential journey at this point is about the journey, and not "getting there". You focus on makers that you can help create a vision with, and assist the maker to the next point. I focus on work with highly experienced makers and get "masterpieces"....generally speaking, room for improvement is scant and the maker and myself want the piece to stand the long test of time, not represent a moment.

I "get it".

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Last edited:
When this thread started out, I thought "WTF, another F'in' mea culpa from you know who". But it progresssed, even without Steven. He and I have been at odds before, and more than once, I came to realize that, like all of us, Steven is who he is. We all choose to like who we will. For me, it's been a difficult time nailing down how I felt about him. Then again, the feeling has probably been mutual.

But over time, I've come to realize that he's a helluva lot of fun in person and a guy that's fun to be around, the few times I have. That must mean I like him in person. It's how he translates his thoughts to type here that screws things up in my mind. It ain't the person, it's my perception of the person. So I for one take Steven with internet warts and all. I'm not special. Steven doesn't need any acceptance from me. But too many people know him well enough personally to call him "friend", so I've decided to read past any negative typing and hope he sticks around. My heart tells me that anyone willing to give this many mea culpas means it.

That recent post (106) of his - just right.


This advertising message has been brought to you by the Franklin Mint
 
Last edited:
Steven that was very nice

Lorien you are a very big man when it comes to being a gentleman along with many other virtues :)

Bob I laughed out loud at your ending statement. I tip my hat to you sir :thumbup:

But all I really care about is the me being president thing :) so please lets get back on topic
 
It seems like the forum bug has done good things for this conversation. Thanks to Coop and STeven (and all others) for reading my post and hopefully taking it in the spirit I meant it to. It seems that once we begin to discuss rather than argue then all can get something constructive out of this, and I am glad that the forum didn't complete my second post that I tried to enter. Big ego's and strong opinions aren't a bad thing- but they are when they get in the way of good old fashioned communication. And the second half of this thread has been good communication and a couple of chuckles- just what we need.
 
I myself am very simple, straightforward and forgiving in nature
and therefore can really enjoy Hot Threads like this one.
By "enjoy" I mean truly appreciating the sharpness of some
of the mind's involved in such opinionated dialogues without needing to take sides -
just reading (and sometimes reading again) and enjoying the discussion...

If someone could put together (cleverly) the bits and pieces,
the ideas, responses, feedbacks and written retaliations from
about 20 Threads where Steven stirred things up, one could
put together a beautiful article on "Trends and Philosophical
Approaches to Modern Custom Knifemaking and Collecting"
.

Could even make a good Academic Presentation....
And it sure would be good reading....

Thanks Steven and all the rest of you guys,
David Darom (ddd)
 
Steven, you think I'm willfully obstinate, I think you're maliciously disdainful.
Neither of us are entirely right, and now that we both know that, I'm greatly looking forward to meeting you again, with this fresh insight.
In person to person communication, it may have taken us a year or less to come to this understanding, but considering we've met only once, I find it pleasing that we've come to this point at all.
6 years goes by like a heart beat.
 
I don't know much, but I do know that sometimes you have to hold the knife in your hand before you can properly appreciate it. After a recent xmas get together with other British knifemakers and collectors (which was a bit of a show & tell). I came away with a number of revised opinions on knives that (judging by the pictures) really didn't do it for me and others that looked great but would have been a disappointment, had I bought them going by pictures alone.
I belong to a British forum as well and I think the main difference for me is that, I know most of the people posting (personally), so I kind of "get" what they're trying to say when they post, even if they're not expressing themselves very well. I know when they're being sarcastic (or joking) because I know their personalities. This forum is way bigger and has a larger catchment area, so we have to accept that not everyone is known to others. This can often mean that people get questioned more about why such & such a statement was made or the motives behind it, which then aggravates the situation. I think there's more of tendency to get "personal" very quickly here and also a more tolerant attitude to (childish) threatening behaviour of the "my dad's bigger than your dad and I'm gonna come up there and kick the carp out of you".
"I write like I talk and if you can't handle that, well tough" works on a personal level and with face to face, but sometimes we have to be more circumspect on the internet. because we don't get the additional cues that a face to face or even phone conversation can give you. It's particularly difficult sometimes to pick up when someone is giving valid criticism rather than trying to score "cheap points".
Take the case of having an "online argument".
To some people, an argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition and is intrinsically an intellectual process. Others assume an argument is taking up a contrary position and all that is required is the automatic gainsaying of any statement the "opponent" makes. A third group can't seem to have an argument without delving into the intricacies of someones birthright, the sexual proclivities of their parents and involving threats of bodily harm. It is usual, with this third group, that the participants live as far away from each other as is humanly possible, so that the possibility of actually carrying out the threats being used is as remote as possible, as cost alone would make those actions ridiculous. Coming from a small country where we all basically "pee in each other's pockets" the third option is not particularly tolerated, because it's all too easy for those threats to be made real.
I tend not to post that much because for me, it's all about the knives. Not the people who make them or their country of origin (unless that has some bearing on the philosophy behind the knife). I do find that my tastes have changed over the years and the only thing I can be certain of is that things change. I never really saw the point of folding knives for over thirty years and considered them a poor compromise (almost "toys") but the last two years have seen me acquire more folders than fixed blades and I can now appreciate the work/skill that goes into them. It's similar to music tastes. 20 years ago I thought Blues was music for "boring old fogies". Now I appreciate the nuances. So now I say "there's no such thing as good music/bad music, there's only what I like and dislike".
STeven, in post #112 you stated "we both want the piece to stand the long test of time, not represent a moment." But have you considered that you might just be missing out that way? The Art Deco movement represented a "moment" in human history yet the objects created to reflect that moment are more collectable now than they were then, possibly because of a different vision. I think the world was enriched by that moment, it still forms the basis of what is considered "modern" in design and opens a door to alternative thinking and design cues which only reappeared in the '60s. It takes all sorts to make a world and a community of knifemakers should be revelling in our diversity rather than trying to ostracize each other. Hell, the rest of the world already does that, why make it worse.
I think the forum would lose out without your (particular and sometimes peculiar) contribution. While I don't necessarily agree with what you say sometimes, I find that there's merit in it, even though it sometimes takes a lengthy "argument" to percieve what that merit is.
Sometimes "being right" is the only reward you can get from a situation. State your case and move on. Teaching technique is easy, but enlightenment comes from within.
All the best and I respect whatever decision you come to.
 
Back
Top