I know it's an aesthetic personal judgement but whenever I see filework, I see art knife and waste of time AND it destroys the elegant lines.
Hi Dave,
He he he! First I have to chuckle. Damn
art knives, the sooner we lose them the happier we'll be.....
When I want to show a new person my interest in custom knives, I ALWAYS make sure I choose one with filework. That was a real initial lure for me. Works wonders for them, too.
But, I understand how it is either an acquired taste or one that you don't like. Try convincing the hoards of collectors of high-end gents folders to enjoy more hard-use knives and tactical styles. I think you'd hit a dead end.
One of the delightful things about filework (and that is a broad term from just about everything from serrations for a better grip, to carving and inlays) is the sheer amount of variations that are out there. I do agree that the tried- and-true consistent
vine filework is so common that it can be boring. Poorly executed vine filework is also an eyesore. Like all things involving style, some makers have a knack, and some are just going for the ride.
I ordered a Crawford Kasper which is soon to come in. Pat and Wes do the most basic style (half rounds and slices coming in at 90° to the work) of filework, and I find an excess of this to be uncreative. But that's their 'look' so I asked for a touch of it on the backspine alone for the effect. But not all over (Go back to the less-is-more thread.....

).
Filework CAN show creative and artistic talent. Frankly, if I was to rant on something phasing out sooner than later, the trend in tacticals to
pimp handles with a random cuts with a Dremel tool for grip is the lowest form of creativity I encounter in a custom. But, I digress....
Coop