From tactical to traditional

Alast I found myself eyeing some nicer traditional slipjoints. Picked this one up recently. I'm really liking it thus far.




 
All you need to learn is something like what I'm using, if only you had the mental capacity to be able to use it yourself.
 
Last edited:
I figure Randall handles deserve Randall Mortise tang, though not necessary, I would prefer it..
 
Last edited:
The classic Randall fighter design works and I find the guards to be very important if you're serious about a fighter. One can play around with the ricasso/choil size and often is a personal preference thing.

Grew up with traditionals. My dominant fixed blade "need" then was camping and hunting uses. But I never really found the slippies to be totally lacking for either of these applications. My first fixed blades were fighters and included the Randall M15 and M16 and a few others. This was during what I consider the Rambo era. The problem was I never used them for anything. I still find them to be very cool. I guess my most recent fighter is the Blackjack 1-7 which obviously is a Randall imitation. Still have the use issue, but unlike you I don't feel a need to carry a large fighter as a self defense knife.

About that same time I bought a Vic Tinker as I was going to be traveling and felt it might be very useful. It was. The Tinker changed my edc needs and I have pretty much carried a SAK of some sort since (more than 25 years). The traditional and fixed blade duo is very functional.

I hope this "Attack 12" works for you. What is the blade length on that design? I am assuming about 7.5" more or less.
 
Good points 22...



It's the little things that can often make the biggest of differences.
 
Last edited:
So, when you say "12", you mean blade length as is typical such as my 1-7. I always believed 7-8" was the sweet spot on this kind of design. But the big bowies were certainly larger and were intended for fighting (essentially a short sword).

Good point about the asymmetrical handle. In Randall-esq, I always prefered the border patrol handle. But I see your point about being able to quickly feel which side has the sharpened edge.

I would actually prefer a smaller guard. I just want something that will stop my hand from sliding up onto the sharpened edge and something I can feel quickly.

Added: I never played around with Paintshop Pro. For a while I used AutoCad Lite for engineering drawings as AutoCad was pretty much the standard file type and I wanted to be able to share files on sketches between clients if necessary. Now, I don't do that so much anymore and probably should look at something else that is simplier but functional for scaled drawings that doesn't cost a fortune. The truth is I wouldn't even offer my file to a client unless it was a contractural requirement. Been a few years since I even used AutoCad Lite and I doubt I would be very efficient using it today.
 
Last edited:
Rimfire,

The lengths I quote are all overall length of the blade/knife
 
Last edited:
But can it print at 1:1? That really is the question with scaled drawings.

I agree with what you said about the guards, but since fighting is a minor concern of mine, I lean toward a smaller guard. You see, I carry a handgun often.

You're making me dig out my Randalls and take a fresh look at them. One of the funny things that I observed is that I tend not to like 1/4" blade stock on a knife. A good example is the BK-2. But when I look at the knives designed for fighting, they are often in 1/4" blade stock including my Randalls.
 
22,

It can print to whatever % of scale you wish.
 
Last edited:


I've definitely passed the point of no return. I've gone traditional.
 
IMG_20161202_191448_zpsdr5zaosm.jpg

Hmm..



Hmmmm......


I see a pattern....
 
Last edited:
Hope you enjoy it, it's not something I would get though... damascus/plasticine... hollywood knives. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
AVigil is gonna be building a 14 for me... CPM3V at 1.5" wide and .218" thick.
Can't wait to see this one Matt, I've always admired the 14 and have owned a couple in the past myself. What handle style are you going with?
 
Here is what was in my email... Thanks to Coke... I need to learn computer drawing... This will be my 14, with a higher grind referenced in the last page.


I'm a small knife guy, but I'd be all over that one. Can't wait to see it.
 
Great thread. I myself haven't gone to traditional (I do own a few) and I probably never will. Why? Quite frankly, I just like having a lock for the most part. I found that I have been moving from tactical knives to just carrying a Multitools or SAK (traditional?). Many days I use the pliers or scissors more then a blade. Plus the other tools (namely the screwdrivers) come in handy. The blade on a MT or SAK is enough for me nowadays.
 
There was a time when my grail folder was a bead blast tanto D/A Socom, grail fixed was a Strider BT. At one time, I owned every production Emerson and MT OTF. In this last year, I've carried a large tactical folder maybe less than 30 days.

My "POU" has shifted to thin slipjoint folders and large fixed fighters. Furthermore, I've noticed that each fixed blade I buy is more "traditional" than the last.

I'm now playing with the idea of having a 7.5" Randall 14 homage built in a "super" steel.

Haha, you're getting older. Instead of thinking about fighting you're thinking about what works best for the job at hand. Chalk it up to getting wiser and leaving a voluntarily rough and tumble lifestyle behind.
 
Coke, I appreciate your efforts on the software. I am going to look at it. I have to be able to overlay essentially a border with title block and so forth onto any 2D drawing I do (for work). Draftsight is another program that I am looking into.

SAKs are considered "traditionals".

I have not really figured out what a traditional fixed blade for sure is other than one that does not have a painted blade. I feel sure age has a little to do with things, but more importantly experience and just liking blades.
 
I have not really figured out what a traditional fixed blade for sure is other than one that does not have a painted blade. I feel sure age has a little to do with things, but more importantly experience and just liking blades.

22,

I'm not sure what you mean...
 
Last edited:
I like to make them too :D





 
Back
Top