- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 4,409
Hard use folding knife? I would question your definition of hard. That Mudd knife looks pretty neat though.
Hi, are you talking to me? What's your definition of hard use?
Andy
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Hard use folding knife? I would question your definition of hard. That Mudd knife looks pretty neat though.
This knife doesn't get alot of attention and I don't understand why, but the Burke Production Rockstar is defintely a hard use knife. IMO I would put it in the same class as a SnG, and Sebenza. The handle uses 2 Ti slabs, with open construction, lockup is rocksolid, and the stonewashed blade is CPM154 The action on the two I have own(ed), has been smoother than any SnG, PT or small Sebe I have had. I guess the only complaint I have would be the size of the pocket clip, but other than that this is definitely an over built harduse knife...that is worth taking a look at.
![]()
![]()
Dave
The Mudd is a very nice knife, I just wish the pocket clip wouldn't get stuck on the lip of my pocket - Mudd owners out there know what I'm talking about
Hmmmm....now I'll have to go look for one![]()
Hard use folding knife? I would question your definition of hard. That Mudd knife looks pretty neat though.
It is tough. The only thing I don't like about it is the sharpening notch, which tends to catch on fabric or cardboard or whatnot when beginning a cut.
I forgot to mention that the MUDD works very very well with gloves. It has a nice big beefy grippy handle, a nice deep finger notch, and the blade release is easy to find and use but not easy to accidentally release. It also sits very low in the pocket.
Andy
If you're referring to the Griptilian, which has a handle similar in composition to FRN (not RFN), it has a lock that'll outlast even your beloved SMF.An RFN handled liner lock at 10% the cost will give you exactly what you pay for, regardless of the public's impression.
Wow! You must be one of the ultra-cool people from the psychic friends network! Can I get your autograph, Miss Cleo?Most of those owners were raised on plastic knives, I don't believe their range of experience gives them a opinion with depth.
They're also hijacking the thread, which is a witness to their character.
If you're referring to the Griptilian, which has a handle similar in composition to FRN (not RFN), it has a lock that'll outlast even your beloved SMF.![]()
Yeah, unless the little omega springs break.![]()
It does happen, but not often, and I've never heard of both breaking at the same time.
Sorry, Josh. Axis lock > Frame lock.![]()
+1I guess you haven't been reading the forums. "Broken Omega Springs, what do I do????"
I think that a complicated (more moving parts, springs, axis bar, shaped tang, liners) locking mechanism would not be preferred over the simplest locking mechanism (framelock) for a hard use folder. Increasing the complexity exponentially increases the chance that something will break or fail.
I guess you haven't been reading the forums. "Broken Omega Springs, what do I do????"
I think that a complicated (more moving parts, springs, axis bar, shaped tang, liners) locking mechanism would not be preferred over the simplest locking mechanism (framelock) for a hard use folder. Increasing the complexity exponentially increases the chance that something will break or fail.
I think that a complicated (more moving parts, springs, axis bar, shaped tang, liners) locking mechanism would not be preferred over the simplest locking mechanism (framelock) for a hard use folder. Increasing the complexity exponentially increases the chance that something will break or fail.
For the record I think the AXIS lock is going to fail before the framelock as a direct result of the complexity and increased number of moving parts, increase both of those things and the statistical probability that one of the parts will eventually break and fail (for whatever reason) increases exponentially over a mechanism that essentially has one moving part.