- Joined
- Nov 1, 2000
- Messages
- 28,365
I always thought that there was no better beater than a Rolex diver's watch.

The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Only problem is, I actually carry and use most of my knives and I enjoy using them. So unless you think I've got a stigma against my enjoyment of using my own knives, you're line of reasoning doesn't hold up very well. Nice try, though.Ahh, and it sounds like now we are trying to establish a stigma against those who hold the opinion that a knife is best enjoyed in use.![]()
I always thought that there was no better beater than a Rolex diver's watch.
![]()
The number might change for each individual person but I think most of us understand the question.
I have a strong connection to anything that I buy and I don't want something, even a tool, to suffer unnecessary damage. If I buy a knife to use, I will use it. Otherwise I won't buy it. I've been in the gray area a couple of times, and eventually sold those knives and bought something else that I wouldn't mind using. I carry and use all of my folders, although I pick some of them to use for more intense use and the others mostly for EDC. I have a lot of fixed blade knives, many more than I can use, and I've identified certain ones that I will use. I would not mind using any of them if I needed to but most of my nicer fixed blade knives are hunting knives and I have very little chance of doing much hunting.
I used to be a watch enthusiast and there are a lot of parallels between watch enthusiasts and knife collectors. I've bought several low cost watches to wear as "beaters", but even a low priced Seiko that I bought turned out to be too nice to wear where I knew it would be beat up so I couldn't bear to wear it. I finally bought a cheap used Casio that I was willing to let get beat up a little and did wear it during those times.
![]()
I always thought that there was no better beater than a Rolex diver's watch.
![]()
True dat, just go on any job site and you'll see a ton of Rolex watches, day in, day out,...![]()
Yep. That's the prevailing point of view, all right. It's not possible that someone could collect knives for their artistic value, right?
So here are the dominant POVs around here:
1. If you don't use your knives, you've got no reason to live.
2. If you collect knives and don't "use" them, we'll tolerate you . . . barely.
3. If you invest in knives or worse yet, flip them, you are the scum of the earth.
If you think I'm wrong about that, stick around awhile and keep your eyes open. You'll see what I'm talking about sooner or later . . .
What are 3 things that every "operator" has?
Pickup truck, Rolex, and a divorce.
There was a time when the Rolex part used to be true. Now most "Tier 2 personalities" go for the G-Shock. Before the brand took on a luxury aura in the 80's, it's fame was it's durability and waterproofness.
I prefer to take the fisherman at his word, not to foist sentiments on him. He asked a straightforward question, to solicit sympathetic answers, to be sure, but if he says he's not judging non-users, then I believe him.
That knife is incredibly popular. I was sad that the 560 got phased out. But once I held a 562cf I was really impressed with the materials, fit and finsh and the feel.
Definitely in the realm of the 940 and the PM2.
Bout' broke my thumb off though trying to use what looked like thumbstuds haha
I guess a Sebenza would be considered the starting point for high end knives?
So if this is the prevailing view at Bladeforums.com, and if it chaps you as much as it seems to, what do you get out of this place that you are a gold member with over 6,000 posts? Sorry, but I see plenty of posts all over BF that celebrate the pristine collector knife, the one that goes into the pocket but never actually cuts anything, the knife that goes from owner to owner.

Actually, if you've paid attention, you've seen posts from ME about knives I carry that rarely if ever cut anything. That doesn't mean I won't cut something with them if the need arises. I simply don't work in an environment where I have to cut stuff very often and when it do, there are cheaper, handier instruments I can cut with that don't put wear and tear on my expensive knives. But that's not the point. The point is that folks like you insist that I must be harboring a resentment because of what I say and the way I say it, and that's simply not the case. Holding resentments for me is a matter of life and death. (Don't be concerned if you don't understand what I mean by that. There are plenty of folks around here that do.) I'm just an observer who calls it like he sees it. And in the case of the observations I made earlier, I've seen them a lot.
PS: Re: getting chapped, there's a saying that may apply here. If you spot it, you got it.![]()
+1 on using high-end/high dollar knives. I was against it when I came here some years ago, but I've changed my tune completely.
Now on those trout, what are you doing removing the heads? They're some of the best parts of the fish!
Zieg
Just toss the trout back and problem is solved.![]()