Hog Killer photos

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just decapitated Alien
with out a permit what do I win?

RATPACKKNIFEandotherRATs277.jpg
 
Brennanscott said:
I want to see a guy try to hack a boar apart with a knife only to get gored and bleed to death while the pig gets away.

I cheer when I watch these morons get speared/gored/killed during the running of the bulls.

But hey, that's just my opinion.
Click to expand...

What a hate filled man. So sad.:(
 
l2lku2 said:
What I achieve by selling them is to deny you the opportunity to sell new ones in place of these ones.
Click to expand...

Actually, you're spreading the disease. Don't you know no one can stop at just one?! Now there are even more people out there that got a good cheap tasted of ESEE that are going to go buy the whole lineup!

Not good, dude. :thumbdn:



;)
 
Man, I'm utterly disgusted. Not by the photos, but by the self-righteous, pretentious, patronizing crap that has been spewing out of a select few people's mouths for the last few pages. Who was the guy that suggested I have deficient mental capacity because I don't agree with him? Whoever he is, he can sit on my Junglas and spin on it--that is as soon as I get one, not just because the photos prove this is a seriously capable knife, but just so I can spite l2lku2 and his little boycott.

Seriously though, the mental capacity thing really sticks out.. The thing is, I think most of the people that wine and moan about "humane" killing and "needless" killing don't have the mental capacity to understand that what they're going through is an emotional response that they're attempting to rationalize with faulty logic. The idea that it is a needless kill is completely subjective as is the idea of a humane kill.

Past that, the big problem I have is most people are completely indiscriminate of the creatures they deem to be worthy of a "respectful" and "humane" death. For some reason cows and hogs and other mammals that remind us too much of what we are are need to be killed with "respect", but when it comes to ants no one has a problem with pest control companies killing a few million of them with noxious gas.

Past all of that, I just hate the attitude. The level of audacity that one needs to have to just start spouting off at the mouth about their beliefs when no one asked or contested them. This guy didn't go out, kill a couple of hogs, come back and say, "Everyone, buy a Junglas and go mutilate some animals!" he was making a living. How can anyone say that he didn't "need" to kill them like that? You don't know his circumstances, all you know are your trumped up presumptions about what is right and wrong, and anyone that actually goes the extra step to fabricate an agenda just so they can get on their soap box and spout off just irritates me, especially when they do so in such condescending fashions as to suggest that we're "inhumane" or that we're just to stupid to know what's right or wrong.

So without falling further down the spiral too much, I don't really care what you think of me, or whose knives you boycott: I'm not impressed with your so called morality.


I am impressed with the capability of the Junglas. Still though, I don't go hunting or anything and was actually looking at a Lite Machete. How does the Junglas do for hacking through vegetation as well?
 
No way those little hacked up pigs in those pictures are bigger than a man. I doubt their tusks could be considered on par with a Junglass either but hey, I'm done.

Justify it the way you see fit.
 
KennyB said:
I am impressed with the capability of the Junglas. Still though, I don't go hunting or anything and was actually looking at a Lite Machete. How does the Junglas do for hacking through vegetation as well?
Click to expand...

On thin whippy stuff, a machete is better.
On vegetation with a bit of stiffness, it's just the bee's knee.:thumbup:
 
All is fair in love and war. When it's beast vs. beast, all bets are off-do what you have to do to be the last one standing. Hunter gatherer societies dominated until maybe 5,000 years ago. 500,000 years (supposedly) of human existence hunting wild animals of all sizes with edged tools. I don't see how or why this is even an issue. You wouldn't be alive if you and your ancestors didn't kill animals with edged tools for food, hides and other harvestable materials. I just don't get what the issue is... turning their internal organs inside out by putting a 2500 fps chunk of copper through their body is ok, but running a 10 inch knife through those same organs isn't? Someone needs to face up to reality. Hogs regularly reach 350 pounds in Texas, and some have been killed in the 600-750 pound range. In case you haven't seen the pictures, these things reach the size of a bear, and are extremely violent.
 
For some reason I'm suddenly reminded of the opening scenes of "2001: A Space Odyssey."

Good grief.

I still say Andrew has got great big f'in' cajones to go after the pigs with a knife, forget it being a Junglas or anything else. I'm impressed with the guy. Less so with the knife, as just about any knife of equivalent shape and sharpness should do a simliar job. But MAN... I'm impressed.

I wouldn't do it, but only because I'm not man enough. Not because I'm against it. It looks like it could be fun. But then, I used to club baby seals.



KIDDING!!!! I'M JUST KIDDING!
 
Brennanscott said:
No way those little hacked up pigs in those pictures are bigger than a man. I doubt their tusks could be considered on par with a Junglass either but hey, I'm done.

Justify it the way you see fit.
Click to expand...

say you were to be put into 1 of 2 cages.
In one cage, a boar with sharp tusks, and in the other, a person of equal weight with a junglas. since that hog doesnt look that big to you.

which one would you rather be in?
 
You all can accost me but I kind of have mixed feelings here. If this dude is as good as it appears at killing them with a junglas, I suppose the method is about as swift and humane as a bullet, but I guess for me it is more about an attitude that you have when you are taking the life of an animal (especially since I have always thought pigs are smarter than most). yeah they are pests and it's good to kill as many of them as you can, but I'm not really down with the "badass" sort of attitude when you are killing animals that are X times smaller than you, trapped up against a fence fighting for their lives. I don't even know if the guy sending the pics had that attitude--for all I know he was just thinking about protecting the property, but that seems to be the prevailing attitude in this thread...
 
Brennanscott said:
No way those little hacked up pigs in those pictures are bigger than a man. I doubt their tusks could be considered on par with a Junglass either but hey, I'm done.

Justify it the way you see fit.
Click to expand...

Well, I don't think a tusk is any match to a super-sonic projectile that can penetrate through a body like it was a spear either, but since when was it about good sportsmanship?

See, this is where I'm having trouble understanding the idea of it being "humane". Does anyone think that a bullet traveling at that kind of velocity through a body is painless? Even if you get an animal in the heart, the only thing saving it from horrible pain is shock. I'm not a biologist, but I'm fairly sure that with wounds the size of those on the hogs, they were in shock and running completely on adrenaline and had a very similar death in regards to pain as they would to a bullet to the chest cavity. The difference is that a bullet immediately destroys their vital organs, and takes them down "faster" by actually debilitating them. There's less of a struggle, and so it seems more humane.

I believe someone mentioned reforming the way to execute our prisoner's to that of China. I'm not really in favor of the Chinese, but I have always thought that a bullet through the brain is much more "humane" than a gas chamber or lethal injection. It's gruesome and gory though, and so people see it as "cruel" or "bizarre". Yet some how suffocating a man with gas, or stopping their vital organs individually with chemicals is better in their eyes. The idea that it's "painless"; I'm pretty sure your nervous system cannot work fast enough for you to feel pain when a slug rips through your head at several thousand feet per second. On the other hand, what if that chemical they gave you to knock you out before they stop your lungs doesn't work, and you sit there conscious while suffocating?

Anyway, I'm diverging from my point. People think the gas or lethal injection is "humane" because it's uneventful, it's not gory, and it's not offensive to the people doing the killing. You shoot someone in the head, they're likely going to squirm around on the ground a bit as their nervous system has just been significantly altered, and it's a very disturbing sight; same thing when you kill any animal in any violent way to any other vital organ--the body will react. On the other hand though, when you watch someone breathe in a gas and then suddenly they're dead without so much as a peep, it all the sudden seems "painless" and "humane". To whom? The person being executed, or the people watching? How do you know that the entire time they're suffocating they're not aware of it? In the case of lethal injection, the body wouldn't even be able to go into shock for the person to cope.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top