The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Interesting topic.
If I'm in an urban, suburban or other "civilized" environment (where I am 99.99% of the time), I carry a folding knife or multi-tool. I don't flash it about because I was raised to understand that such behavior is both crude and vulgar. I was also taught the correct usage of the term "y'all." [Got the picture?]
If I am in the "wilderness" or other "uncivilized" environments I usually carry one or more fixed-blade knives. I make no effort to hide them, but neither do I make any effort to emphasize their presence. Once again, such a display would be both crude and vulgar.
A knife or other edged implement is a TOOL. Just like almost all tools (hammers, screwdrivers, drills, automobiles, etc.) they can be used as weapons. A person simply does not go around brandishing or calling attention to one's tools ------ unless said person actually IS A TOOL!
Do I get an "AMEN!" on this?
Where do live that seeing people carry a D cell Maglite around in residential neighborhoods?
In the places I've lived (both coasts and in between) they were common in the 80s but pretty much disappeared by 2000. Only people I see who use them these days are cops and security guards. Not even my buddies in the trades have them anymore.
The D cell Maglites are tactical clubs disguised as lights and as I said, raise my suspicion in the same way that a 10" screw driver does. Context is everything.
What is the point worthy of consideration? That we should accept that there should be more stringent laws on knives because people like Pinnah think they are primarily weapons and should be regulated as such? That is both wrong and insulting to anyone who actually appreciates knives as the tools they are. Also, please don't attempt to dress me down, that's not going to go well for you. Pinnah is the one who decided to bring Government into this, not me. Get it right, thanks.
Society informally and correctly considers knives to be weapons.
1) I think it's counter-productive for those wanting to protect knife rights to argue that a democratic society doesn't have the right to regulate dangerous things like knives. It's counter-productive, because that is an utterly absurd radical position. It's frankly nuts. Of course the government has the right to regulate things and arguing to the contrary just make knife lovers sound like radical anti-goverment extremists. We (society) regulate all sort of dangerous materials from fireworks to gasoline to guns to cars and to knives.
2) I think it's counter-productive for knife advocates to argue that knives aren't weapons. That's entirely disconnected from the history of knives and it's not born out by people's experiences or by the FBI statistics. Knives get carried for EDC way, way, way more than other tools like screw drivers and hammers and unlike hammers and screw drivers, knives are designed to cut. So it's no surprise that knives get used as weapons in crimes many, many times more often than "tools". To insist that a knife is merely a tool damages the cause of advocating for knife rights by sticking our heads in the proverbial sand. Society understands what you and those like you deny - knives get used as weapons frequently, much more frequently than tools and blunt objects. IMO, we are much more effective as knife advocates to encourage careful, context aware use of knives to minimize the fear of non-knife users. More succinctly, if you want society to accept a knife as a tool, we should embrace and respect the fact that a knife historically and currently is also a weapon (or potential weapon) and as such, worthy of greater judgement than a hammer or other tool.
I don't expect to change your mind. I suspect you'll be guy cleaning his fingernails on the park bench with his fixed blade. IMO, your arguments make things worse and do nothing but invite more bad regulations.
Quiet,
I suspect that you and I agree on more than you might think.
I'm sure we both enjoy knives and treasure our right to own and use them.
I'm very sure we both find some knife regulations to be ill concieved, ineffective and onerous and I'm sure we both don't want to see more bad regulations on knives where they aren't needed.
This said, I'm also pretty sure we're going to need to agree to disagree on how to protect and expand our knife rights.
1) I think it's counter-productive for those wanting to protect knife rights to argue that a democratic society doesn't have the right to regulate dangerous things like knives. It's counter-productive, because that is an utterly absurd radical position. It's frankly nuts. Of course the government has the right to regulate things and arguing to the contrary just make knife lovers sound like radical anti-goverment extremists. We (society) regulate all sort of dangerous materials from fireworks to gasoline to guns to cars and to knives.
2) I think it's counter-productive for knife advocates to argue that knives aren't weapons. That's entirely disconnected from the history of knives and it's not born out by people's experiences or by the FBI statistics. Knives get carried for EDC way, way, way more than other tools like screw drivers and hammers and unlike hammers and screw drivers, knives are designed to cut. So it's no surprise that knives get used as weapons in crimes many, many times more often than "tools". To insist that a knife is merely a tool damages the cause of advocating for knife rights by sticking our heads in the proverbial sand. Society understands what you and those like you deny - knives get used as weapons frequently, much more frequently than tools and blunt objects. IMO, we are much more effective as knife advocates to encourage careful, context aware use of knives to minimize the fear of non-knife users. More succinctly, if you want society to accept a knife as a tool, we should embrace and respect the fact that a knife historically and currently is also a weapon (or potential weapon) and as such, worthy of greater judgement than a hammer or other tool.
I don't expect to change your mind. I suspect you'll be guy cleaning his fingernails on the park bench with his fixed blade. IMO, your arguments make things worse and do nothing but invite more bad regulations.
Nah. Don't listen to those intellectual elitists in their earth quake resistant ivory towers probably in California.Oh goody. Everyone listen up and pay close attention. A guy with multiple degrees!![]()
Our society does not.
That is why I can legally walk around with knives, when carrying of weapons is frowned upon by the law quite heavily here.
That is why I was able to help the cute girl in the university library some years back, prying the staple from the papers she needed to photocopy, using my knife (they have a power stapler there, but no staple remover...), and get a smile and a thank you, rather than a scream and the cops being called.
In my world, tools are useful things that make life better (like the walking stick that keeps me upright when my back spasms from time to time).
In some other people's world, tools seem to be scary things that need regulating.
You should post up your facts and source. FBI and justice reports, 2010, say that blunt object and "other weapon" were used in almost 1000 more murders than knives. Meaning the list goes gun/blunt object other/ then knife. You seem to just be spouting on falsehoods. You can find the actual information on the FBIs supplemental homicide reports. As well as the bureau of justice website. And perhaps you could enlighten me as to the source of your history lesson on knives. I daresay over 85% (a number I pull out of my butt)of knives are designed for something other than killing and maiming humans. So they are being used in a way not intended by the manufacturer. Like hammers. Or a pipe wrench or a baseball bat.
I'm not picking on you. I just think you are lying. Or have been given false information. And hate to see it passed on.
Final edge, I would be curious to see your sources too as there are definitely facts to be reconciled.
Here are the posted FBI stats from 2010 to 2014. Year to year, the numbers are reverse of what you claim. Year to year, knives are used 3 times more often (over 1000 more incindents) than blunt objects (such as hammers and other tools).
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....able_8_murder_victims_by_weapon_2010-2014.xls
We get it. You hate knives. Why are you here?
Since we're giving them out now, I'll give you an...Amen !
And just think if they were overregulated. You may not have had another tool that could've gave that cute girl a smile.
Remembering that knife also includes scissors and any other cutting implement, and combining blunt with " other" as stabbings don't fall under "blunt" but " other when they don't involve a knife,Final edge, I would be curious to see your sources too as there are definitely facts to be reconciled.
Here are the posted FBI stats from 2010 to 2014. Year to year, the numbers are reverse of what you claim. Year to year, knives are used 3 times more often (over 1000 more incindents) than blunt objects (such as hammers and other tools).
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....able_8_murder_victims_by_weapon_2010-2014.xls