- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 13,363
Hi Anthony,
Kevin is right...you gave him way too much credit. There was no way he could have created the CKCA himself!
Creating a successful organization is the never the effort of one person but very much a team effort.
Hi Kevin,
50 -55 hours a week! Really? Im going to have to call BS on that. That would be 10 - 11 hours a day (Five day week). Almost 8 hours a day 7 days a week.
Les, not that I have to account for my time to you, however since you have called my integrity into question even though you know absolutely nothing of how active the CKCA is and the time required to manage it I will respond. All inclusive, the 50-55 hours is low as managing the CKCA is a 7 day job and actually busiest on the weekends. That's when I get the most member inquiries, the most members joining (34 new members in the last 30 so days/245 total), the most questions on the CKCA in general etc, etc,. My wife has pointed out on several occasions that I spend more time managing the CKCA since I retired than I spent in my career managing construction for a major retailer. That's not too far from fact.
I received an average of 23 knife related e-mails per day between general CKCA communications, the CKCA website "contact us" link, the CKCA forum "contact us" link, general correspondence and being asked questions and having questions answered. Most of these require an answer and I make it a point whenever possible to respond to each in the day it was received to keep them from piling up.
I usually spend around 2 hours per day on the phone discussing knives or knife related issues and that can be as much as probably 4 hours if there issues regarding our cancer research projects, website/forum issues etc. In addition to the above there's the general day to day operation of the CKCA which I won't even bore you with those tasks. Then there's the stuff that just pops up. For example, I spent about 12 hours last week working on something for Mike Haskew of Blade Magazine. Over the next 2 weeks I will spend probably 2 hours per day writing my first major article for Blade Magazine. I could go on and on, however I will just say ALL this time and effort goes towards promoting custom knives not Kevin Jones.
Anthony is right as well. You do promote the knives (and their markets) of the knives you collect. You do so because you love this type of knife but also because you now have Tens of Thousands of Dollars tied up in them.
Now that's total BS, I aggressively promote ALL CUSTOM KNIVES, anyone who knows me will back that up 100%.
Kevin you are not alone in the "promotion" of the knives you buy. Your participation and "promoting" of the styles and makers is partly what this forum is for. To show photos, discuss custom knives, their materials, construction techniques, sheaths, ideas, concepts, shows, hammer-in's, gatherings, articles, etc.
That's pretty obvious Les.
Hi Jtech,
I think it is important for those coming here to seek "Prices and Values" of knives that they check out the "experts" on this and other forums. To find out what the "expertise" is.
Take the Hancock for instance. I suspect no one really knows what it is worth...we can guess...but we don't know.
So with all the years experence you guess as to what a knife is worth? Anyone who has spent years studying, following and collecting Tim's knives should be able to tell within 10% what that knife will bring on the broad market. I'm NO EXPERT, however pretty sure I could come within 10-15%.
You can contact Tim and find out what it sold for initially. I'm sure that would be an excellent starting point.
The ABS website no longer lists the dates the makers received the MS or JS stamps(???). Tim's website shows he received his MS in 1994.
Perhaps the first question to be asked is why no MS Stamp? To acquire the Master Smith rating takes years of hard work to attain. Consequently, the makers are generally very keen about putting "MS" on their knives somewhere.
Absent of a "JS" or "MS" mark is rare as I stated earlier, however it happens. I have a Fisk Boot Knife made in 1995 only marked "FISK". Why, because Jerry misplaced his stamp. Perhaps Tim didn't put his normal mark on this one because of it not being forged or the very limited ricasso area and/or small blade.
Perhaps it is a different "Hancock"?
Perhaps it is a forgery?
In my opinion it's an authentic Tim Hancock as the "Hancock" and "1997" marks are consistence with marks he has used. Don't need to be an expert to tell that as a look at page 145 Of David Darom's book "Tim Hancock The Western Bladesmith" supplies the information. You being a paid "knife promoter", I'm sure you have a copy of this book.
Also, look real good and see the sheath is marked "Hancock" as well which is also consistence with Tim's sheaths.
***************