Sure, Noss's tests are not scientific, but he has never claimed them to be.
In real life when a soldier uses his knife to pry open crates, open hatches, chop wire, cut cable, free his traped buddy, smash plexiglass, or just combat in general it is not scientific.
Noss tries to replicate real world use in his own workshop, sure its not perfect but it does wean out the weak from the strong.
Certain results of the tests are irrefutable, like when a $9 .098 thick mora shows equal strength to a beautiful $300 .255 thick beast.
Most of his knives are not donated, some are like the Busse's which were actually sent back after testing.
He buys out of his pocket almost all of the time.
He has never even tried to claim a warranty, I don't know where this assumption comes from that he tries to get a new knife after beating one to hell.
I respect Mr. Becker very much, he is a hell of a good guy and a hell of a knife designer; I love Becker knives.
The bk9 didn't do well in the test, I blame the steel because 0170-6C always was abit brittle in bigger blades.
However, Ka-bars 1095cv has great lateral and mechanical toughness in a design that doesn't have stress risers.
If a new Becker is tested I believe it will do much better then the Camillus example.
Oh, I know knives are for cutting and am a wilderness type that loves to sit down and carve, hunt, learn bushcraft skills, or make traps.
