- Joined
- Aug 31, 2009
- Messages
- 2,696
so, whenever the inevitable debate between people who baton versus people who chop comes up, people invariably say this statement: "Chopping with an axe is fine, but if I'm fatigued in the wilderness I feel less safe chopping. So, I choose my knife to baton with."
now, feeling less safe in awkward conditions chopping makes sense from a survival stand point. I can't disagree with it. the part that boggles my mind is that not only can you use an axe to baton with, but axes are far more efficient at it than knives are . I mean, people batoned with axes far before knives, and they are built in a way which makes them much more efficient at the act.
I can't think of a single scenario where a knife is more efficient or safer to split wood with. am I wrong?
I'm not hating on batoning with a knife, I get why some people like doing it. I just can't wrap my head around the backwards reasons people use to defend certain aspects of it.
now, feeling less safe in awkward conditions chopping makes sense from a survival stand point. I can't disagree with it. the part that boggles my mind is that not only can you use an axe to baton with, but axes are far more efficient at it than knives are . I mean, people batoned with axes far before knives, and they are built in a way which makes them much more efficient at the act.
I can't think of a single scenario where a knife is more efficient or safer to split wood with. am I wrong?
I'm not hating on batoning with a knife, I get why some people like doing it. I just can't wrap my head around the backwards reasons people use to defend certain aspects of it.