- Joined
- Nov 25, 2006
- Messages
- 7,038
so, whenever the inevitable debate between people who baton versus people who chop comes up, people invariably say this statement: "Chopping with an axe is fine, but if I'm fatigued in the wilderness I feel less safe chopping. So, I choose my knife to baton with."
now, feeling less safe in awkward conditions chopping makes sense from a survival stand point. I can't disagree with it. the part that boggles my mind is that not only can you use an axe to baton with, but axes are far more efficient at it than knives are . I mean, people batoned with axes far before knives, and they are built in a way which makes them much more efficient at the act.
I can't think of a single scenario where a knife is more efficient or safer to split wood with. am I wrong?
I'm not hating on batoning with a knife, I get why some people like doing it. I just can't wrap my head around the backwards reasons people use to defend certain aspects of it.
I use\do both. Knives, hatchet, axe. I try to stay away from battoning a knife if I have a more efficient alternative. I am always cognizant that axes and hatchets can inflict severe wounds and I have made efforts to educate myself in their safe use\handling. There are simply times when I do not want to hump a lot of cutting tools and only have a knife on me. I will use that if I have no alternative. Light weight folding saws also reduce some of my knife battoning needs. It is a judgement call at the time with whatever tools are on hand.