Hahathat's his pride and joy. A meyerco semi-tanto partially serrated 420 stainless combat fillet knife.
a true 1/4 BK9 would be heaver than even the Camillus, at what benefit? what is that thickness and weight giving you?
plus they'd probably have to tweak the design for balance issues
oh, and it would cost a LOT more. thick stock is harder to work, and just plain costs for material.
would you pay 50% more?
You could always have one made. Had this monster made out of 1/4" thick 5160 steel. Makes the Camillus BK9 (top) and the Junglas (bottom)look small
the number of broken BK9s in *normal* use is approximately 0. that i know of.
It's funny you mention that.
The only video evidence I have ever seen of a BK9 breaking was in the Knifetests video.
That knife was a Camillus made BK9 with the thicker blade. It failed in a test that a $15 Ontario 10" butcher knife with a .090" thick blade passed with flying colors. But then again two Chris Reeve $300+ fighters also failed those tests. Methinks the current BK9 blades are just plenty thick if the steel and heat treat quality is up to snuff.
Just because a knife is made from thicker stock does not make it better or stronger . If some of the guys here would LISTEN to what Ethan Becker has been saying in many of his recent video and audio interviews, he feels the same way.
my BK9 is triple thick:
and 3 edges - separates, lifts, cuts...
my BK9 is triple thick:
and 3 edges - separates, lifts, cuts...
So you are saying thicker is NOT better
3/16" now and going to 4/16" (1/4") would not cost 50% more. Not even close. They could make a special run and test the market. The Cold Steel 5/16 thick blade is a killer, but I would be happy with just a 1/4" like the BK2.