Improvements the 25 made to the 21

Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,971
As requested by kidcongo:

I'd like to start the definitive list of all the design features that the glorious Sebenza 25 has improved upon from it's dated predecessor, the 21.

Let's preface this with a reminder to all that Sebenza means 'work' in Zulu. The Sebenza has become a working folder icon.

Beginning with some quick points:

The blade:

The 25 has a more defined drop point profile improving tip strength for heavy duty tasks. Perhaps the most important part of this, is people will stop incorrectly calling the Sebenza a clip point as often happens on the 21! I would be happy enough if this was the end of the post. But oh no, there's more! The 25 comes in at a well balanced .140" (3.56mm) blade thickness which is a slight increase over the Large Sebenza 21 at 0.125" (3.175mm). Enough of an increase to improve strength, durability and it provides a more robust feel, but does not cause it to be too heavy.

It also has a large hollow grind that comes very close to the cutting performance of a flat grind, but still slices as well as a hollow grind. Perfect for all around use as it combines the best of both grinds. The jimping has been made more aggressive thus is can now be called useful while wearing gloves. It is still gentle enough to be kind on the hand, perhaps with the exception of some hammer grip tasks where the webbing between the thumb and pointer finger is riding very high on the blade, but this can be mitigated by moving ones hand to a safer position away from the cutting edge as designed and using a thumb on the tip end of the blade, which is more comfortable with the new blade thickness. It also come standard with double thumb lugs for an ambidextrous opening.

The pivot:

The 25 has a newer pivot construction doing away with the bushing system. This has improved user serviceability, customization and reduced the need for a trip to the factory for washers. Because the pivot design can be tightened by the user and both the male and female sides of the pivot can be adjusted, the user can adjust the pivot to get the exact feel they want. As the washers wear over time, the user can simply adjust further to maintain the buttery smooth feel the Sebenza is known for. This is a vast improvement over the downfall of the bushing system in the 21; the blade play that develops as the washers wear and requires the knife return to the factory for new washers.

Now, both washers are the same size further improving the feel of the action by reducing friction, creating more pockets for small bits of dirt to move into, longevity in washer life, more lubrication stored for longer service intervals and more contact surface on the lock side for more strength in the pivot, generally considered the weakest point of a folding knife. The diameter of the pivot has also been increased for more strength. Finally the heat treated 416 stainless steel stop pin has been strengthened and interference fit into the lock side of the handle.

Other improvements:

The Sebenza 25 also has a ceramic ball lock bar interface that increases the lifespan of the lock and helps it to maintain it's position. The lock bar now moves further into the tang improving the strength of the lockup without reducing the lifespan of the blade. The ceramic ball lockup also provides a more awe inspiring and confidence inducing 'thwack' when opening the blade. The ceramic ball does double duty by falling into the detent helping the blade stay closed.

Perhaps the biggest visual difference of the Sebenza 25 is the handle design. The addition of an index finger groove in the handle provides a more positive grip while balancing the need for a universal fit, as Chris has commented the more specific the design of the handle, the less universal it's fit. The design of the 25 was balanced with this is mind. The 25 has also done away with 2 of the 3 holes on the butt end of the handle. Gone is the single empty hole often wondered at by new CRK fans, or band-aided over with an inlay; and the hole for the lanyard pin has also been removed. Thus the lanyard pin is no more, and lanyards can be tied upon the spacer which has been changed to accommodate this.

Finally I would like to discuss the pocket clip.

If I could describe the pocket clip in one word, it would be perfection. Let us take a look and revel in it's comfort:

IMG_3023a.JPG


As you can see, it contours to the hand like it was made to. In fact, it is.

How does this compare to the 21?:

IMG_3024a.JPG


Well not bad huh?

That is because, they are basically the same clip!

So how is it that some people find the 21 comfortable, but the 25 not comfortable:

I would put forth that they are indexing their fingers in the finger groves in a way that causes the palm to conflict with the pocket clip.

I propose those that find this to be the case, try the following steps:

1.) Place the 25 in ones hand so that the pocket clip sits in the correct position. Please refer to my earlier photos for exact details, but you will know you got it when you feel "Ahhh there is the perfection I expected." Try it with your eyes closed. Your hand knows what to do, if you stop your brain from overriding it. Breath in deeply and slowly, exhale the prejudice.

2.) Once you have the pocket clip correctly positioned, close you fingers and see where they fall on the handle. Repeat it several times, slowly, gently. You will feel the knife disappear into your hand like it was made just for you. It was.

3.) Wash you mind of preconceived notions of how your fingers "should" be. Think of the 25 as a woman. She wants to be held the way she wants to be held, not the way you want to hold her. Listen to her, be a good partner. Stay open-minded and try new things. As Chris said, "Take care of your knife and it will take care of you!"

4.) If you too have now experienced perfection, stop here and bask in it. If not, repeat steps 1-3.

Should the above steps fail you, your Sebenza 25 can be given a safe, forever home where it will be treasured and appreciated here, at the Canadian Coalition for the Prevention of Sebenza Abuse. It will be able to frolic with other 25's, visit the Wicked Edge station where it will be maintained at perfection and return to the motherland for a yearly checkup. We will not judge you. Please contact me for more info on giving your 25 the best home possible as space is limited.

Ok my toddler is sitting on my lap trying to help me type for the past 30 minutes so this will have to do for now.

Enjoy!! :D
 
Last edited:
I've never understood why people think the bushing pivot is, "better". Its different, with different compromises.

In my opinion, the Sebenza 21 ships from the factory a little smoother but the new pivot (for me inkosi) is better in the long run now that its broken in. Especially with the floating stop-pin.
 
I've never understood why people think the bushing pivot is, "better". Its different, with different compromises.

In my opinion, the Sebenza 21 ships from the factory a little smoother but the new pivot (for me inkosi) is better in the long run now that its broken in. Especially with the floating stop-pin.

How long would you say "broken in" took you to achieve?

In my experience the 21s have the worst action out of the box. This is because they are almost all Damascus though. The only knife I ever sent back to factory for bad action was a 21. I've also had probably 3 times as many 21s though.

I will say the bushing system is still what made me love the 21 when I first got it. It was a broken in one. I was like Ohhhhh nice.
 
Weird, I was actually really disappointed with my Inkosi when I 1st got it. It was hard to even open it at all with my thumb when I got it.

It progressively got better as I tore it down, removed too much grease and played with it kind of non-stop for a month. Now its actually my smoothest knife.

To be fair, I only have one Sebenza. But, my experience is the opposite of yours. It is Damascus and felt like it was perfect out of the box. I haven't broken it in, it went right into a case as I cant make myself use the mammoth.
 
Finally the heat treated 416 stainless steel stop pin has been strengthened and interference fit into the lock side of the handle.

Is this correct? I thought the 25 had a stop pin that needed to be loctited into place because of the particular position in which it needed to be held to not interfere with the blade opening/closing. Or is it now press fit and I missed that somewhere along the line?

Nice synopsis, Justin!
 
Is this correct? I thought the 25 had a stop pin that needed to be loctited into place because of the particular position in which it needed to be held to not interfere with the blade opening/closing. Or is it now press fit and I missed that somewhere along the line?

Nice synopsis, Justin!

So it is still interference fit as far as I know. It's fastened with loctite and under normal conditions does not need to be removed by the user. It can be but better left to a factory service. Basically you just leave it in place when you do your service.
 
Did the 25 improve the 21 or are they just two totally different knives?

kidcongo wanted a debate so here it is. I made my case. I would love to hear you make a case against it!

Summary:

All things being equal, (we're not talking mammoth inlay with coated damascus blade here) If you put a Sebenza 21 in the make it better machine, a Sebenza 25 is what would come out. I can't wait to see how the Inkosi product line improves on the 25. But that is a debate for another time!
 
kidcongo wanted a debate so here it is. I made my case. I would love to hear you make a case against it!

Summary:

All things being equal, (we're not talking mammoth inlay with coated damascus blade here) If you put a Sebenza 21 in the make it better machine, a Sebenza 25 is what would come out. I can't wait to see how the Inkosi product line improves on the 25. But that is a debate for another time!

I've never had a 25, so I can't debate it. What I will say is that the "improvements" over the 21 are debatable as I have never had an issue with them. The bushing system may not be better than the non bushing system but it is unique to a Sebenza. I have never had a knife with that feature and it is one of the features that I do like. My main hold off on owning a 25 is the finger choils. They just don't look like they would fit my hand and I find the simpler the handle the more I like it.

What 25 lovers see as improvements 21 lovers see as unnecessary. I don't see either as better; I just see two knives appealing to different consumers and their preferences.

It's a fun thread though.
 
kidcongo wanted a debate so here it is. I made my case. I would love to hear you make a case against it!

Summary:

All things being equal, (we're not talking mammoth inlay with coated damascus blade here) If you put a Sebenza 21 in the make it better machine, a Sebenza 25 is what would come out. I can't wait to see how the Inkosi product line improves on the 25. But that is a debate for another time!

I would call the Inkosi the perfected mini-25 with the floating stop-pin.
 
Is this correct? I thought the 25 had a stop pin that needed to be loctited into place because of the particular position in which it needed to be held to not interfere with the blade opening/closing. Or is it now press fit and I missed that somewhere along the line?

Nice synopsis, Justin!

So it is still interference fit as far as I know. It's fastened with loctite and under normal conditions does not need to be removed by the user. It can be but better left to a factory service. Basically you just leave it in place when you do your service.
 
I would call the Inkosi the perfected mini-25 with the floating stop-pin.

I like the changes, except the size.

In particular I like the changes to the washer, I think those are awesome, and the stop pin is good in theory though I don't see how it changes anything for an average user. It's certainly not worse so it goes down as an improvement to me, just not the biggest. It's almost time for a Sebenza 30 !! :D
 
So my question after reading this is: what can the 25 offer those of us who have Unnumzaans? Isn't the Zaan similar to the 25?

I would like a 25 someday, but having my Zaan seems to cover that base... What do you think?
 
So my question after reading this is: what can the 25 offer those of us who have Unnumzaans? Isn't the Zaan similar to the 25?

I would like a 25 someday, but having my Zaan seems to cover that base... What do you think?

First of all I had a Zaan, but didn't keep it long so I can't compare as well. I had it MAYBE a year.

Most of it from a technically functional aspect is covered with a Zaan, but not all. It can easily be argued that a 21 + Zaan = 25.

The things that are blatantly different are the ergonomics and the groves in the scale. Some prefer the ergonomics of the Zaan, others the Sebenza. Lots of that is personal.

Lots of the new pivot and lock bar interface are the same. Remove the old Zaan pivot from that comparison. The thumb stud vs the stop pin with the O-Ring. Completely different in that regards. The LBS and the ergos of releasing the lock is another thing to consider which is also way different. The blade profile with the false edge and the hollow grind, both different.

Probably going to sound weird, but when I had a Zaan, it was more like a CRK version of a Strider SnG which IME was junk compared to CRK fit & finish quality. I couldn't get a Strider that I liked so I'm not saying they are the same!

You could argue they are functionally close enough that it is not worth having both, if a Zaan vs a PJ 25 was the comparison, but the form is so different to me they are worth separating.

For me, the LBS, stop pin with o-ring thing and difficulty accessing the lock bar are reasons enough to take a 25.

I do think there are some people in the market for a tactical style working folder who hate the Sebenza thumb stud that might thoroughly enjoy a Zaan.
 
Improvements the 21 and 25 made to the Regular Sebenza: None....!!! 😊
 
Hey Justin,

interesting thread. Your title is not really inviting for a debate, because it already makes a point into your preferred direction.

I go with what bluemetalchurch is saying. Things you call "improved strenghts" I have never seen reported as being failed at the 21 ..... So where is the need/demand for such extra strenghts? Never heard about a broken pivot at the 21. So why a bigger one needs to be "sold" to us as an improvement? Same goes for thicker blade and other stuff. "Material battle" has lead to an inflation of "overbuilt tactical folders", ending so far with Medford & Co. ...... knives. Saying that the ceramic ball increases lifespan of the lock is confirmed by ...... what? I think it is an assumption. Time will tell.

We have seen this with the steel insert at lockbars. "Small step for a man. Huge step for mankind" ? :D Well. Chris has proved that finest production capabilities with very tight tolerances don't need steel inserts. I think steel inserts allow manufacturers with less controll over their production process to produce less production waste .... So why is the ceramic ball now that important?

Chris Reeve has always been a small manufacturer, but always great on marketing and economics. I believe some of your improvements are "feeding" the crowd with expected innovation and on the other hand some of these improvements are just lowering production costs. Which is fine. Not a shame for a company like Chris Reeve. Well done. But no need to sell them in a way by explaning what was less good with the 21 and thank god has now been improved.

;)

Stefan
 
Hi Stefan,

I know what you are saying about the title, I was going to put something like VERY LONG list of improvements to troll kidcongo a little just to have some fun with the topic but I decided it would be a bit too personal to him and probably enrage lots of other people. :cool:

So the improvements to the pivot on the 25 are not really just about sheer strength or something. They are also about user serviceability, reduction in workload and all the other things I mentioned less time at the factory for washer replacements, things like that. Not just sheer strength from someone using it as a pry bar.

The ceramic ball is primarily about lockup %. People comment on the % of their lockup when they sell their knife to indicate the remaining lifespan in the blade. The carbidizing of the lockbar face on the 21 was to prevent wear and extend the lifespan of it and prevent lock rock as it wears deeper. I mean sure you can say, how many people actually wear out a Sebenza but it's not really the point of who has, it's about what can be improved as that is partially why we pay these prices for a knife. If we were happy with good enough, maybe we would have a Spyderco and a few hundred dollars left over.

With the ceramic ball, you can have more of the lock bar behind the blade, so it's stronger and safer, you can get less wear so it lasts longer, you can get a better lockup with less tendency for lock rock because of the wear and surface area with removing the contact between the titanium and steel, and you get a better detent so it's a stronger closed position in the event you fall or similar. For me, there are many positives, and no negatives that compare :)

I'm not saying the 21 is bad, I'm arguing incrimental improvements have been made is all :)

Unless you want to sell me allllll your terrible 21s then yes they are bad and will probably kill you. ;)
 
Back
Top