- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 22,473
The thing for me is that why run M390 on the low side if S35VN (CRK and RHK use) is great on the low end of HT. Why not use M390 to it’s optimal hardness and brand it as a “cutting machine?”
To me it’s a choice of pleasing the masses with sub-optimal HT choice on a steel that could perform very well at a higher HRC.![]()
Well, think of it this way. Warning labels. We all know why products have them. It's the same reason why a lot of these tactical knife manufacturers and designers design them with thicker blades, and run their steels softer. You just know some dude is going to try to pry a car door open with the thing, or some other such nonsense. Sure, a great many people who buy these types of knives won't do that, but well, they have to make design and execution decisions that take the other type of user into account. It's either that, or run their knives at a higher Rockwell with a thinner grind, then have to be replacing blades left and right when customers buy into their "TOUGH SPECWAR FIRST RESPONDER HELL YEAH" marketing, and try to do something dumb with it. I think they've done the best they could.
It's rather like how modern car makers really dial back the power their engines could theoretically make, because they don't want leadfoot idiots blowing their $15,000 motor and blaming the company.
