Of course Chris Reeve is better the two are not in the same class. Reeve doesn't put out as many knives as Benchmade and their tolerances are tighter. That's what you're paying for when you buy a CRK. But CRK isn't immune to issues in their production line and when they happen its hard to be as understanding when you just dropped $450 on what you expected to be perfection.
While I will agree that CRK produces less volume, so they have the opportunity to offer a better eye on their product, I will say one thing about the dollar value.
Some brands that want to reach CRK price points (Benchmade 781), should be willing to give that particular model the attention the price tag demands.
If I have $400+ to drop on a knife, it will likely be a CRK, CPK, Spyderco Nirvana, or (conditionally) a 781.
The only way I would buy a 781 is if I got to handle it in a brick and mortar. That is only due to my questioning of the QC standards. On a knife that regularly sells (new) for $425, that shouldn't be a issue. Nevermind "issue", it shouldn't even be a thought in the head of the consumer...
"Oh man! I just dropped (almost) $500 on this knife and I can't wait to open...
...wait, is this off center?
Is this blade play?
This can't be the knife I ordered... The company would check for stuff like this on a flagship model."
Maybe a base line Griptilian would get one checked out of every 20-30, but for 4x the cost, I would expect every. Single. One. looked over.
You want a knife to compete for CRK funds, at the very least offer CRK QC standards. That is a person's job, not a manufacturing aspect. Not a new milling machine, but a person to go "Yep, that one is ok." or "Nope, that one isn't ok."