Bastid said:
Are you saying that you do not expect the price to be higher.
As I noted already, I would expect the maker to set the price based on on considerations of profit. If he feels he can get more for the higher finish then I would expect him to do so. This does not influence my perspective on its value.
Bastid said:
Is an incorrect answer to a question based on limited experience a prejudiced answer?
All experience is limited, thus all incorrect actions are prejudiced?
Consider Cougar's actions as a mod. I am sure that Cougar would be the first to admit he is not omniscient, isn't perfect and in retrospect probably has taken actions that were less than optimal.
Does this make him a prejudiced moderator?
He is always willing to listen to new information and consider it rationally thus I would argue he is not prejudiced even though he does not know everything and probably makes mistakes.
STR said:
How can one define best for someone else ...
Ask them what they want.
[sebenza]
I am also not a fan of the blade shape.
I like the shape for general utility, nice precise point, decent curve, stock is a little too thick. It is also one of the few folders with a deep hollow grind which allows honing to really low edge angles, mine is at ~5 degrees, and this mod can be done with just an x-coarse stone. I did the same with the Meadowlark, but it took way longer as the hollow grind isn't as deep even though the steel is easier to work.
To get the same on a flat grind I would need to basically reset the primary grind or the ease of sharpening would be horrible as the bevel would be massively wide. The edge is only ~2 mm on the small Sebenza and I can reset it on a x-coarse waterstone in the faction of the time it takes me to reset a 10 degree edge on a puukko - even though S30V machines horribly compared to plain carbon steel.
I would like to see the new Calpyso Jr. with a similar hollow profile, and use the recessed clip that Reeve uses or at least use torx or regular screw head types.
Bastid said:
Everyone has preexisting ideas based on what they know which is less than everything. It becomes a prejudice when you ignore new information and refuse to change preconceptions, or simply form your conclusions irrationally in the first place.
For example lets assume you use a handful of ATS-34 blades and they all chip readily on a given type of work, you then come to the conclusion it is a brittle steel and not suitable for that. You are then asked to try out another ATS-34 blade for the same tasks.
Now if someone asked you about the likely behavior it would be obvious what you would say. This does not make it prejudiced. However if the ATS-34 blade doesn't chip, and you ignore that and pretend it didn't happen - that is a prejudice.
-Cliff