They are absolutely substained accusations but since you've asked nicely, for once, I will let it rest. Have a good day Victor!
That is wise.
Maybe in one of my many China trips, we might run into each other and have tea and dim-sum!
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
They are absolutely substained accusations but since you've asked nicely, for once, I will let it rest. Have a good day Victor!
I see that you went back and edited your post. No matter, Victor. I still wish you a good day, no matter how immature that was on your part.That is wise.
Maybe in one of my many China trips, we might run into each other and have tea and dim-sum!
I want to thank all of you for the information, and I really appreciate the wealth of knowledge that is on here. As beautiful as the Rocksteads are I must say that a Shirogorov is probably going to be my next purchase. I've never been drawn to flippers, but after some time on youtube I can say they look like mad fun.
I don't need the factory specs to measure the gap between the size of the standoff and the combined sized of the blade+washers or pivot bushing. Obviously I'm measuring the tolerances of the knife, not the difference between the actual size and the targeted size of the hardware.
For example, if you have a backspacer that's .1580 and a blade+washers that's .1540 - That's a .004" gap. You could be feeling blade play at that point. That's why it's important to machine those components to the same size. The smaller the gap, the tighter the tolerances.
Discuss the question at hand, not each other.
The trolling in this thread by all parties needs to stop.
I believe he may have made that,..but I could be wrong.
Victorf, what is that tool being used on the pivot on that first picture you posted a few comments up?
Mr. Bill Hyde is correct.
It is a simple spanner tool I made out of 17-4PH.
Exactly! Some seem to think that if your tolerances have four zeros, then five would be better and six would be better still. It simply does not work that way. Knowledge of the material properties an the necessary function of the parts can not be overlooked (including planned failure points).