- Joined
- Jun 16, 2003
- Messages
- 20,206
Not to pick on you but I've heard it said often that "you risk breaking your most important tool" when batoning comes up. Can someone clarify that for me? My problem with that statement is 3 fold.
1) I don't believe that a knife is your most important tool. Backpackers all over the world including people who make money doing it don't carry anything but a keychain knife so how important is it really? I like knives and see there value but even I don't place it in my top 5 of must haves when I go for a hike.
You won't know how important any tool is until the need arises. Those carrying a razor blade - or "Classic" SAK - are running the risk that they will need more. The classic answer -- the historic majority opinion - is that one should have stout knife when in the wilderness because, on average, it is the most useful woods tool. Ignore centuries of received wisdom if you will and at your peril. Perhaps all will go as planned. It usually does. But . . . .
2) If a knife did break...so what? I've yet to find a picture of a knife that has disintegrated from batoning. Every pic of a broken knife I've seen has IMO still been useful. Not as easy to use maybe as it once was but a sharp edge is a sharp edge.
Every "broken" knife I have seen surpasses in utility the best knives man has had for 99.9% of our existence.
3) And the one that really doesn't make sense to me. If it WERE so important, why on earth would you only have one? I mean let's put aside for a moment the fact that this is BLADEforums where you would be hard pressed to find anyone here who only carries one knife in the woods, regardless of need... If this was your A number one most important tool, where's the backup?
You prioritize your load. Opinions differ. In truth, I have a SAK "Farmer" in addition to a 4" sheath knife when backpacking. Others say, "One is none." (Not that they really mean it. If 1 = 0 and 2 = 1, then 2 = 0
