Just saw this.....Bark River is no more?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've seen the cross contamination of belts myself in my shop. My water dunk bucket is used for carbon and stainless too. Happens more at coarser grits, but I make sure to scrub the blades well when they are done to get rid of it.

There were a lot of posts in the FB groups on Friday and last weekend. There were some with pictures of the made in China blanks with stickers on the bags or knives themselves. Someone also posted the 3 lawsuits, too.

Here is one I found:

I found another link, but you had to be a member to see it... haven't found the 3rd link again?
 
My last purchase of these was around 2004 or 2005. What are the odds the steel is mislabeled? Sorry if this question has been asked before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taz
My last purchase of these was around 2004 or 2005. What are the odds the steel is mislabeled? Sorry if this question has been asked before.

The official answer seems to be from 2019 to present on certain models. The "definite maybe" answer seems to be it could be from the start. Much like how many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop...
 
Just for clarification, if they did use a belt which had been used on carbon steel, then used that belt on stainless, it is indeed possible that they contaminated the oxide layer on the stainless steel, making corrosion of the stainless blade possible. It is a known issue when processing both carbon steel and stainless steel in the same shop.

Stainless steel is stainless because of the adherent oxide layer. If you contaminate that layer with bits of non-stainless steel, corrosion of the steel is possible.

So, the supplied explanation could have been actually what happened.
I very much agree that its possible and was why accepted the answer when it happened to one of mine. As everyone has said the issue now is the fact that they have caused everyone to question everything they have ever said or done as well as every quality control issue which could have been legitimate is now called into question.


Something else I have been wondering about the chinese blanks is heat treat related.

Were these blanks supposedly already treated when they were purchased from the supplier or were they sent off to whomever was always heat treating the blades for BR?

If they were sent off wouldnt it be obvious to the heat treater if Stewart asked for a CPM 154 specific heat treatment and it wasnt CPM154?
 
I've seen the cross contamination of belts myself in my shop. My water dunk bucket is used for carbon and stainless too. Happens more at coarser grits, but I make sure to scrub the blades well when they are done to get rid of it.
One thing that keeps being ignored in this discussion of contamination is that grinding particles of the same steel can also promote corrosion, even a stainless steel. They are high surface area particles and act as initiation sites for corrosion. Acid passivation is performed on stainless steel for exactly this purpose, removing free iron particles.
 
The 2019 date is the 2019 club knife which was produced a few years after 2019. At least for what was admitted!

Bark River from what I understand did no heat treating at all themselves. They receive blanks that were already heat treated, profiled, etc. whether they were from China or from a US supplier that profiled the blanks and sent them to others for HT, like Peters. I believe they were one of BRK's heat treat places?

The blanks that were made in China may have been bought from a US supplier. The China blanks come ground and hardened already although the quality is questionable of the heat treat. So they would not have been sent out for heat treating a second time.

The US done ones were typically sent to be water jet cut out, possibly machine ground and/or fullered before heat treat, then heat treated, then back to BRK as a partially ground hardened blank or a unground hardened blank. The more you send out to the companies, the cheaper it is for bulk heat treating so if they send out a lot it may only be a few dollars per blade to have it done. From what I saw DLT was sending the steel out that they bought to a place for waterjet profiling, but I am not sure if they also footed the bill for machining and heat treating too?

So there was legit steel sent out to legit places for heat treating. Heat treating a steel like CPM154 isn't really different than heat treating 154 CM, they have the same composition, it's the internal grain size and distribution of carbides/sizes that would be different. They would typically test at the exact same hardness even though the CPM 154 would have a much finer grain structure which would lead to increased toughness and increase edge stability for increased wear resistance.
 
I've seen the cross contamination of belts myself in my shop. My water dunk bucket is used for carbon and stainless too. Happens more at coarser grits, but I make sure to scrub the blades well when they are done to get rid of it.

If I recall correctly, a lot of the finishing/polishing process was also done on buffing wheels starting with very coarse and aggressive compounds on up to fine (all this after convexing on belts). It's particularly (pun intended?) easy to cross contaminate via loaded buffs, even more so than with belts, in my experience, especially when starting with coarser grits that will actually remove fair amounts of material. I would 100% believe that they'd have rusting problems with MagnaCut due to this issue.
 
Have any other knifemakers experienced this cross contamination problem with Magnacut?

Has there been another documented case?
 
Thank you for sharing detailed test. Do you also have OES or XRF analysis result?

Thank you for sharing detailed test. Do you also have OES or XRF analysis result?
We don’t have documented XRF or chemistry on file for this specific batch. We did verify it with our XRF gun prior to sending it to the lab to confirm the grade, but that step wasn’t formally recorded.
The lab had already worked on MagnaCut samples during the Survive! Knives situation and noted that this material showed a fine microstructure consistent with MagnaCut. If anything looked off, they would have flagged it.
 
I don't understand all the people asking if their knife is the advertised steel. A pair of self-admitted liars and frauds gave you a list of knives they admit are bad. I feel like we can confidently assume those knives aren't made of the advertised steel. But because they are again, self-admitted liars and frauds, no one can trust that the list they provided are the only models that aren't made of the advertised steel.

Now, another thing going on here is BRK's long history of sketchy work. Now, before I found out about all the fraud, I just kind of thought it was the tradeoff. They have hundreds of models and tens of thousands of knives in many different steels and in handle materials that are generally hard to find elsewhere and at a price that was typically not outrageous. The tradeoff was that the fit and finish on them was never great - grinds are uneven, some of the handle materials aren't perfectly fitted, that kind of thing. I always liked looking at the cool handle materials more than I liked buying the knives. I've only ever purchased one outright, won another in a charity raffle and two more in a normal raffle.

But now I'm kind of wondering if I should have avoided them even more clearly. It's hard for me because there are a lot of people associated with Bark River whom I like and respect - Jason Thoune and the DLT Trading people, Derrick Bohn from KSF and the new owner is also a decent fellow. Some of the associated makers who have done midtech runs with BRK like Dan Tope and Matt Martin and Alex Harrison. But it seems like everyone who had a negative experience with BRK kind of grumbled silently about it no matter how badly they got burned.

I won't repeat anyone else's experience, I'm not going to gossip third-hand, but here's my BRK experience:

1. Getting Mike to do anything personally is impossible. Actually, getting anything handled by Bark River was impossible, weirdly unless you talked to a female employee. Any time I needed anything at BRK specifically, Jackie Troutman was the only person who could actually make something happen. I won a raffle 'mystery knife' in a charity raffle to which I contributed. Mike promised to donate a knife for the charity raffle, but never sent it to the raffle organizer (not abnormal in those groups, a lot of the prizes get shipped directly from the donor to the recipient), but he never sent a picture or even stated what the knife was. Well, I got drawn for it, and I messaged him a couple times after a month went by, and he kept saying he'd get to it. After two or three months, I messaged Jackie instead, and the next day I had a UPS tracking number, and a week later, I had a Bark River Bravo 1 in 3V and firedog micarta. It was typical Bark River, fit and finish was OK but not great, and as a charity raffle win I couldn't really complain, but I didn't keep it.

2. In December 2023, Nick Troutman ran a raffle for six Bark River Gunny folders. These were highly anticipated and there was a preorder for them at DLT. However, they kept changing the designs and adding or changing features. I participated in this raffle, although I usually don't, because it happened right before DLT's 12 Days of Christmas and right after Black Friday sales started, so I figured correctly that the participation would be low and I'd have a high chance to win. I was right, I won two of the six for a net cash investment half of what retail price was. I had BRK die-hards wanting to buy them from me immediately.

Turns out the knives weren't actually completely finished, and I didn't see them until March of 2024. When I received them (All six were bolster locks), the lock on one was minimally functionally and on the other was not functional... at all. Like... at all. It had the same blade security as an SAK classic, and you could close it readily. Forget spine whack tests, you could close it with that safety method you use on slipjoints where you pinch the handle in one hand and use the web between your thumb and forefinger on each hand to exert pressure against the backspring until the knife closes without ever having your fingers in the blade path. Zero lock fitting. The clip was carbon fiber and screwed on as an afterthought and still had visible shreds of carbon fiber hanging off the cutout edges.

I posted about it and while I wouldn't say I was jumped on per se, after I posted that I was having problems with it, I immediately (while I was in the process of uploading the video to Facebook to show what I was talking about) had people posting replies to my post saying I needed to prove it with video or shut up. Well, the videos finished uploading, and then the chorus changed to "just send it in and they'll take care of you!"

I sold the semi-functional one to a die-hard collector who was happy to have it for parts even with the disclosure about how poor the function was, and I sent the other back in to BRK to be fixed. That was also in March 2024. Since then, Nick and Jackie have left BRK, and during the past two years, I have received the following explanations:

"Nick is still going in on weekends to fix these."
"It's on his desk, I'll remind him."
"I'm really sorry, but they lost a bunch of CAD files and have to re-do them."
"They have to order new materials to re-machine some parts for you."

And then eventually after they left, they just stopped replying entirely.

And during this whole debacle, Mike hops into the Bark River Boys group to announce that the Bark River Gunny Folder project isn't a Bark River knife, it was a side project by Nick Troutman alone, and anyone who has a problem with them needs to take it up with Nick.

Here's the top-quality work on my Gunny folder, which I know I will never see again. I don't even care about the knife, I still have a buyer who wants it for parts.

 
Have any other knifemakers experienced this cross contamination problem with Magnacut?

Has there been another documented case?

I’ve seen it as well.

I find it unlikely for MagnaCut blades to actually rust from belt or buffing cross-contamination, since any transferred particles would be minuscule and confined to the surface. That said, those particles aren’t MagnaCut—they can still act as tiny initiation points for localized oxidation. In practice, I think the worst you’d expect (and the worst I’ve ever seen) is very shallow surface rust at those sites, typically on the order of microns rather than thousandths, and more often just light discoloration or a faint patina.

Even in those cases, the effect is largely cosmetic. Unless the contamination is severe and left exposed to moisture for extended periods, it shouldn’t meaningfully impact edge performance or cutting behavior.

I actually tried as a test to maximize the likelihood of cross contamination on my personal EDC knife (aka R&D knife) so I could observe any effects. Under the right light it now has a very light patina from cutting steak.

image.jpg
 
CvvMNHZ.jpeg
So they were basically stealing from suppliers and trying to sell as many completed knives as possible before the whole house of cards came tumbling down.

Best of luck to anyone who supports the son's new knife company.
 
Doubtful Jim will be successful in his venture.

The MI State Police are interviewing women who were harassed / abused and customers who were defrauded.

If you were a customer defrauded or who still had knives awaiting warranty repair that are now without their property should call the Gladstone MSP Office.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top