I just wanted to chime back in to make myself really clear as I re-read my posts and want be sure. I hope no one took any of my posts to be degrading in any way whatsoever, especially newer makers. For the record, I think for semi-established makers it’s perfectly acceptable to have blade blanks waterjet from their own designs. In that instance, it’s simply outsourcing a job that quite literally anyone could do at a savings of time, belts, and bandsaw blades.
For new guys, I think it’s also perfectly acceptable to buy pre-designed blade blanks until they have figured out their own style. If they are being sold, however, I really think that needs to be disclosed. After all, if it’s not your design to begin with, you can't really call it your knife, IMHO. This is why people say something is a “Scagel design” or a “Moran ST24” design.
A good example of a commonly outsourced step is heat treating. I think it’s universally accepted that if a maker doesn’t have the right equipment, knowledge or setup to properly harden a blade, he should look to have someone do it for them while he learns or acquires those skills. I think a maker could also decide that he never wants to harden his own blades, but that should be disclosed. In some cases such as with Paul Bos HT, it might actually be a selling point!
I think that regardless of what people think, some buyers are indeed buying the maker with the knife. I know that when I hold something in my hand that I know was toiled over for hours and hours by a single human, it has an immeasurable value added to it. This is why hand carved wood bowls are more expensive than their machine carved alternatives even though 99% of people could probably not tell the difference on a surface level.
"It’s about the final product" is a misleading way of thinking, in my opinion. That may be true of some types of knives or some kinds of knives, but it’s certainly not true of all custom knives. It doesn’t take long to read the customs forum to know this is true. I think the bigger question is: Is a knife that the maker sourced the ore, refined it, grew the wood, harvested it and did everything himself worth more than a mid-tech knife? The market and prices out there say yes, which seems to prove that its not just about the final product...theres something else at play.
I also think with the changing of technology, things need to change to adapt in the way we view knifemaking. We have neo-tribal smiths, mid-tech knifemakers, machinist knifemakers, etc etc. Each adds their own little slice to the variety of knives that are out there today! There’s no way we can put them all under one umbrella assumption of what a knifemaker should and shouldn’t do on a detailed level.
In all I think it all comes down to control. If you are in control of each step of the knifemaking process, you are a knifemaker. How we define the level of control necessary to call the knife our own is something each of us needs to determine, which is why you find a vast array of opinions on the matter.