Cobalt
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 1998
- Messages
- 17,951
"Originally Posted by Cobalt
Someone stated that every professional they know has not needed a large knife. Well, I can tell you that some of the best profesionals carry large blades. In fact "the FRONTIER BLADE" was a large massive 14 inch long 1/4 inch thick blade that we discussed in another thread here just recently. But I guess those frontier trekers 150 years ago did not know what they were doing as they had wallmarts in every town to get supplies didn't they"
Certainly not wanting to get people fired up again but let's not forget that back in the day when those knives were popular they were a persons secondary weapon. There were lots of indigenous Americans that really enjoyed killing outsiders and the firearms of the day only shot once and were very slow to reload so the knife or the hawk was the second line of defense or offense, and in that situation I think anyone would admit that they would want a knife as large as they could wield.
if you have ever held one of those reproductions you will realize that it would make a very poor fighting knife much like a Busse battlemistress makes a poor fighting knife. These knives are far to heavy with forward balance to be effective. A bagwell style Bowie is a fighting knife deluxe. Now as a stout knife to finish off large game, I will agree. Much like a secondary gun these days is used to finish off game. A big heavy thick blade could do the same without sustaining damage that a fighter style bowie would get if hitting heavy bone.