Latest 9/11 Mystery Video

I could perhaps be easily convinced that raccoons are Hell spawned and Al Qaeda funded.

My brother saved a dying raccoon cub and kept it for near a year before it went back to the call of the wild, thank Heaven.

What an evil vicious bastard that funny little cutie turned out to be.
 
I shot the raccoon raiding my trash nightly. Kept getting into the cans despite preventative measures.
Next morning, with the cold corpse of her mate in plain view, the female began to feed on the trash. She stopped to sniff once at him. That's it.

The little ground squirrels here eat their dead on the highway... well, soilant green for rodents.....


munk
 
Jerry Garcia and the Blues tradition? What of it? Johnny Cash sang about killing his girl and the video was banned from CMT. Old country tradition; death, murder, sickness, adultery, etc etc.
When these lyrics are written, they are 'pretend'- make believe; not the same as thinking the Twin Towers were taken down by Haliburton and the CIA.


munk
 
Let's just say that when something like this happens, we ought to consider that the official story is not necessarily "from God"
People make mistakes.
Look at JFK. The Warren Commission says Oswald did it.
The House Select Committee on Assassinations says there was a 95% probability that there was a second shooter behind the fence.

even official stories change. Thats all im saying.
 
Arrhhhhh! i be wearin' me tin-foil helmet me thinks, till at least tuesday, ter keep out this corn-speeracy stuff being beamed out by them ale-ean llibberuls.
helmet.jpg

i did howsome-ever especially like the bit whar they proov thet dubyah bush wuz responsibble fer assasinatin' president linkon 'cus he were a secret southron spy in the pay of queen victoria, an' thet michael moore were the secret son of mahatma ghandi an' mother teresa 'cus the sun shines out his fundiment.

p.s. - the virgin sacrifice ter the sun god behind me wuz disqualified on physsical grounds an' we ate a pizza instead.
 
kronckew said:
p.s. - the virgin sacrifice ter the sun god behind me wuz disqualified on physsical grounds an' we ate a pizza instead.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Sir. I nearly spat coffee all over my keyboard on that one:D

Jake
 
Great link Dave, boy those FACTS thingies sure make sense. Good God I'm tired of this subject. Munk is right, if you believe our govt did this then you are hunting, I mean hunting, for an excuse to America bash. This was a supreme act of Evil. If you blame Bush for this then you set him on a pedistal almost even with Hitler. You may not like Bush, but at least try to be rational. The science is not there. USE YOUR BRAIN!!!

Did I watch the whole thing. NO I DID NOT, AND I WILL NOT. My time is too valuable. In fact, I worry about anyone who watched the whole 90 minutes after watching the first 90 seconds.

No offense intended Danny, I just don't buy it, I don't see one factiod that makes me even consider it as probable, and I am so tired of the same dumbass arguments that it has to be the truth.
 
you know, there's no reason the bad guys here arent still other terrorists. Bin Laden owned property in the WTC. He made money from the insurance.
Who is to say the extra bombs, if there were any, werent his?
People can say there are too many coincidences, but what are the odds against 4 different airplanes all being hijacked at the same time?
 
There is just too much about the theories proposed that seems forced . The comparisons made seem tailored to produce a result .
 
I think the odds of high jacking those 4 planes were pretty good if that was the plan, and it was. They were counting on no one putting up a fight. For years planes got hijacked, went on a ride, sat on a tarmac for a while, negotiations, and usually ended with the passengers being OK. The passengers had no idea that they were doomed and just went along because that is what we taught people to do to stay safe. When those hijackers accomplished what they did with box cutters, they were counting on that. I believe they could have done it with bare hands. If you work at a bank as a teller, you are taught to fork over the cash on command during a robbery, even if you don't see a weapon; same mentality. Those hijackings on 9/11 were easy as hell to do. Just announce your intentions, maybe rough up a person or two to show you mean it and the rely on the programming of compliance to do the rest. I am not so sure it wouldn't be just as easy today, given the mentality of the average citizen. That 'just comply and it will turn out OK' training is still going on. You just have to be crazy enough to execute your plan to succeed.
 
DannyinJapan said:
People can say there are too many coincidences, but what are the odds against 4 different airplanes all being hijacked at the same time?
Click to expand...

I don't see coincidences. I see a group of people with an axe to grind, a willingness to die, professional training, a well thought out plan, and a large bankroll, directing an attack against a largely unaware and very complacent target.

That's the problem that I have with conspiracy theories in general and this case in particular -- the available evidence, viewed without bias, supports the simplest story. We cannot prove conclusively that someone else wasn't responsible, but my fellow forumites have not yet proven conclusively to me that the earth isn't a flat plate balanced on the back of a turtle yet, either. There is nothing wrong with questioning established wisdom in the process of refining one's personal view of life and the universe, but after a certain point the ultimate goal of such an exercise -- truth, or at least a reasonable fascimile of it -- becomes a secondary objective to the questioning itself. The entire thing becomes a philosophical exercise rather than a practical one if such questioning is pursued far enough. We can both agree that there's green grass under our feet, but are we seeing the same grass? Or the same feet?

As I said, people are free to believe what they want. My objection is when it's presented in an ignorant (or worse, intentionally deceiptful) manner to support an agenda. Most of these theories fall in this category from what I've seen.
 
As I said, people are free to believe what they want. My objection is when it's presented in an ignorant (or worse, intentionally deceiptful) manner to support an agenda Dave Rishar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I think the CIA's been running around blowing up nightclubs in Asia, trains in Spain, and subways in England.

xinel- did you leave me any tooth paste, or worse, put nanobots inside for evil reasons?

munk
 
"Loose Change" is a great vid too.

My opinion? Let's see.

I have discovered a mere glimpse into the magnitude of corruptness of this world. I don't mean that to say I haven't seen much. I mean that to say that I am much more aware of what goes on behind closed doors than the average citizen. It's scary. Don't ever forget what the answer to 99.99 percent of questions ever asked is: MONEY. You really would be surprised.

I'm a mechanical engineer.

Combine these two, and I'm not someone who wants to argue proven facts. I'm someone who hates seeing proven facts ignored.

It's Matrix time people. Red or Blue pill. Most people can handle the wool much better than the truth.
 
talonturbo;
Please refrain from watching the movie, 'falling down." ( I think that's the title)


munk
 
My brother in Law is an Engineer. My father is a brilliant man, a QA engineer. Neither believe conspiracy theories on Towers. I guess like expert witnesses in Court, you can always find the you need.


munk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top