The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Lets see about that. If there are those whose immediate reaction was to not copy or quote my stuff anymore or apologize for collecting my information just because I questioned it, it may be a bit more about me than about the information, and that is what I dont want it to be. If the information makes sound sense and can stand on its own, use it all you like. But it must stand on its own, if you were to pass my own information back to me and offer the fact that I said it as proof of validity, I would quickly point out the flaw in your thinking.
Look at the same tired old routine when you dare challenge unverified wisdom of a popular expert, and you are quickly confronted by Kool-Aid drinkers intent on defending the faith. You will not be presented with any data or facts supporting the claims in question; instead you will be asked to do handstands (and the acolytes homework for them) to prove a negative to a level that was NEVER asked of their idol before eagerly chugging from the punch bowl. The common pattern only continues if you allow your time to be wasted with providing countering information only to have it dismissed or ignored by a mind that will accept no information, no matter how compelling, that would upset their comfortable world view. They dont care about opposing data or they would put just an ounce of energy into finding it on their own. The reason they embraced the doctrine in question is because it felt good to have it spoon fed to them without intellectual effort on their part, why the heck would they want to start working for knowledge now? And that is the toxic leader/follower syndrome that I will have nothing to do with. Some say that I use terms in my posts that require they consult a book just to understand what I am saying. To this I only have one thing to say- GOOD! If my posts force people to research and learn on their own so that they are able to independently verify that what I am saying is not a load of crap then I have indeed done more good with one post than all of the feel good books and articles written thus far!
Dont get me wrong Deker, I am very honored by the value some people put on my input and I am appreciative, but if my input must be anything my sincerest wish is that it be the antidote or cure for the cult of personality based dogma that knifemaking has been fed for too long, and not a replacement for it. I once said that I hand out information like guns to an oppressed population, but that is all I want to do as history is littered with populations that upon achieving freedom immediately installed the next dictator. This thread gives me a lot of hope, not because of any unnecessary pot shots at a known smith, but because we finally have enough independent thought to question and challenge the status quo in print.
I find this most intriguing due to how rising relativism in our society would have most believe that absolutes are absolutely wrong, and that anybody who speaks in absolutes is absolutely wrong (do you see the irony in this). However, reasonable people will realize that there are indeed no absolutes, which means that instead of just shades of gray there are in fact some absolutes as well in our world. While there is prose with nuance, there is also binary code; yes or no, true or false and the difference is mostly how we choose to approach it. Some would say 1045 makes a decent knife and feel safe hiding behind the fact that this is a position that can be true or false for any given person. While I prefer to say that 1045 simply will not reach 60 Rockwell no matter how you quench it and then allow you to decide with the confidence that you have solid, absolute data to make a sound decision. That is the strength I see in absolutes and solid numbers. Instead of worrying about what you may feel a knife should be, and whether that jives with my feelings, I can just give you real tangible tools to make those decisions on your own.
Perhaps "absolutes" was poor word choice on my part…
Kevin, what is funny about your verbose posting here is that you are sugggesting that your followers should not do their own homework! They should blindly follow you, and use your preferred materials and methods.To do otherwise relegates them to a class of Kool-Aid slurping, mouth breathing, flat-earthers licking the boots of someone other than you.
In the article in question the author says to test the material before investing a bunch of time using it. You say never use steel except those recommended by Kevin. Your same old tired argument of those not following in locked step, is those questioning you want you to do "the acolytes homework" for them. How about some simple statements about the question instead of demeaning verbage meant to quiet any opposing views?
Historically, apprentices in the metal trades would have been trained to be able to do some testing to determine the hardenability of unknown steel and to develop a tempering temperature for the tool. You say you want people to do ther own homework, but you say in broad strokes that most people aren't smart enough to understand that not all LMBS are suitable for knives?
Kevin, instead of relegating those that follow the advice of authors other than yourself to a lesser class of beings, how about just good solid advice. The language you use to describe other authors and those not closely following your advice is out of line. Some of us get our info from any source we can find. I for one do not believe everything I read, but think there is something to be gleaned from many sources, even if it is a good laugh.
I do appreciate the information that you share on heat treating and have learned a lot from it. I do respect the solid information you provide and do follow it. But I do not like the name calling.
Respectfully
Alden
This has got to be about the most inaccurate flame I have seen posted in Shop Talk. If the author has an uncontrollable urge to troll, he ought to take this to W&C.
Steve, perphaps you could point out the inaccuracies to me.
Kevin, read your own posts to see the personal attacks. Perhaps you did read your latest and saw it for what it was, I don't know I didn't see it.
My point is stick to providing information, not name calling entertainment.
Alden
Many people seem to feel that I attacked Wayne Goddard and in a way I did. But not personally.
...See you at Ashokan, I'll bring the scotch.
Bill