Can't say I agree that ALL knives are "ONLY DESIGNED FOR CUTTING", but that's ok, we don't need to agree, and I don't need to convince you that I am right and you are wrong.The only thing subjective about this is whether or not the individual is personally willing to misuse their knives. With few exceptions, knives are ONLY DESIGNED FOR CUTTING. If its called a "knife", it was made to cut things, simple as that. That why the damn things have edges.....
(By the way, "putty knives" are called "knives", but they're used to spread putty, not cut things. But if sharpened, I'm sure they could be. )
I agree with this^ %100. Outside of dire circumstances, I have several knives that I would NEVER pry with. But that doesn't mean they don't get used, or that they are useless, or that I should be scorned because I won't pry with them.CAN they be used for other things? Yes of course. No one is saying you can't. I'm certainly not. The only thing I want to put an end to is this nonsense that using your knife to get off a balcony is "common sense use". With their responses, some people in this thread are implying that that is actually one of the main tasks it was designed to perform and is one of the reasons everyone carries them to begin with. The people who suggest this then have the audacity to use this warped sense of knife purpose as the basis of their insane argument that others shouldn't even carry knives because they "aren't willing to use them", as if not wanting to pry doors means you are somehow not using your knife correctly.
Of course, going back to the OP's original hypothetical, it's certainly possible that some knife maker might make a$1000 knife specifically for prying as well as cutting. So for a knife like that, prying might very well be "common sense use", if that's a use that the maker intended. And I'm sure I've seen such knives before. Maybe not with a price tag of $1000, but definitely knives suitable for some amount of prying.
Ease up, there's no reason to get upset over any of this. My post was not directed at you. If it had been I would have addressed you specifically by name, or quoted you (like I just did), that's how I post. My post was merely a commentary of the subject of what constitutes "misuse", and who gets to define what that is. This is a topic that comes up every now and then, and I chose this opportunity to share my thoughts on the subject. There is nothing here to be won or lost, it's not necessary to change anyone's mind, everyone is entitled to their opinions.I am not the one advocating for some sort of knife purism where no one is allowed to use their knives for what they want. The exact opposite is true. Why you cannot see that baffles me.
Last edited: