- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 13,363
Though this thread has gotten seriously "off topic" it's sure been an interesting one to follow.
Steven and I differ of this subject even though we feel about the same way regarding Loveless knives in general.
While I have handled and examined enough Loveless knives to fully appreciate the designs and ergonomics, thus I certainly appreciate the "purest" maker (Vestal, Buchanan, Lovett etc.) of Loveless style knives, I also feel there's a place for the maker who takes the Loveless design and tinkers with it, or creates his rendition. I've always appreciated experimentation on the part of makers as it often raises the bar for custom knives.
I say let the market sort it out. If the Loveless way is the only way then the market will kick the "non-purest" Loveless maker to the curb soon enough.
Steven and I differ of this subject even though we feel about the same way regarding Loveless knives in general.
While I have handled and examined enough Loveless knives to fully appreciate the designs and ergonomics, thus I certainly appreciate the "purest" maker (Vestal, Buchanan, Lovett etc.) of Loveless style knives, I also feel there's a place for the maker who takes the Loveless design and tinkers with it, or creates his rendition. I've always appreciated experimentation on the part of makers as it often raises the bar for custom knives.
I say let the market sort it out. If the Loveless way is the only way then the market will kick the "non-purest" Loveless maker to the curb soon enough.