"OUTRAGED BECAUSE OUR WORK IS BEING STOLEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
I would be outraged too if someone was confusing a $15.00 knockoff with my custom work. Nobody is confusing them or suggesting that, except you, of course. Back to the drawing board - huh. Your jibe is indicative of your ignorance, whether its intentional or organic in nature, I don't know. I suspect the latter.
Yes, I'm being argumentative but the poster asked if others had found their Mtech knife to be useful - for me the answer is; yes. I can find use for a pile of turds. What does that have to do with stealing that pile from someone else's out house?
I find it hard to believe the same person with an appreciation and the resources for fine knives is looking to purchase an Mtech as a substitute for one of yours. You are correct, finally. No one has suggested this, again, except you of course.
Unless it is an exact copy of a trademark design, I'm not sure you would find redress in an American court even if the manufacturer were based in the US.
This is precisely why they are scumbags. They count on it, and steal with impunity. Although, Gil Hibbens has decided to hold them accountable, and is suing. Perhaps, you DO understand after all.
Given the realities of the world, perhaps you could approach them about a licensing arrangement where you could make sure the knife was made the right way and get some of that money. Given the companies thieving history, illustrious reputation for less than stellar quality and complete lack of ethics, we don't need tainted money that badly. Its called integrity.
The earliest knives I recall purchasing as an adult were Japanese folders in the $20-30 range back in 1995 - I remember a line of Benchmade lockbacks with plastic handles and some Rigid brand folders - the two mtechs I've purchased beat these hands down - and given an adjusted dollar cost about 1/4 the price. I am thrilled you have found a product that is commiserate with your values.
Good value - hell yes.