I'm not big into "philosophical bull$hizzle" much, either, grease-man; but I do tend to lean towards the "artistic" side. In that, I know what looks good and feels good to me, I'm beginning to understand what works well, and if a knife just plain looks ugly I'm not even going to pick it up. Blame it on me being left-handed, I guess.
But on the other hand, I read posts from gents like Nathan, mete, and Cashen with great interest. I often don't understand it all, and likely never will. But I've learned a LOT from them and I don't think they're stuffing dogma or an "ism" down our throats, just presenting facts that they can verify. These guys aren't snobs at all, in my opinion. If they were, why would they pour so much time and effort into sharing their experience
with their competitors?
Many knives are not art. But handmade custom knives had better be or they can't justify their existence.
Damn straight! Making beautiful, high-performance knives involves
both art and science, I don't see how you can get around that. I will never be a metallurgist (to paraphrase Nathan, my brain just isn't wired that way), but I certainly appreciate the info. It has saved me a
lot of time and money that I otherwise would have wasted, chasing my tail.
I've seen gorgeous, highly-functional knives made on a rock next to a campfire, and equally excellent ones made on a CNC mill. It makes very little difference to me! The cat is still skinned, either way.
It is a debate that doesn't have a correct answer.
That's a fact.
I still would like to see a sticky thread on metallurgy, simply for my own convenience.
