What do you mean?
(...)
Spyderco, however, has a lot more variety in their lineup, in terms of design "categories", steels, serrations, etc.
I am agree with you on this.
I think it is a fact that spyderco has a larger and more versatile portfolio as most other quality brands.
I had a quick check on the USPTO and I found 68 patents for Spyderco, 5 for benchmade, 60 for Kai USA out of which 18 are for ZT.
Unless obvious mistake sin y query I think it makes pretty clear that Spyderco is a clear leader in pure technical innovation.
However, if the point of the thread is not innovation or "technical power" but "excitement" then it is more about personal feelings.... How we use our knives, how we feel with the developments of the products, the marketing of the brand. Etc....
My personal feelings is that I don't see a clear strategy in the recent products of Spyderco. To be honest the last shot show has been a disappointment for me.
I have a PM2 and I can't decide for another Spyderco... For me they all are quite similar (again I only speak on my own feelings here) or not better than knives from other brands, even if on the price/quality ratio they achieve great successes!
The key USP seems to be the sprint runs.
Maybe a salt can be my next one for diving....
On the other hand the strategy of ZT seems clearer for me. It is about overbuilt knives and they "compensate" pure innovation power with interesting designer collaboration.
I like benchmade but it is all about the axis lock, etc....
So all brands are good and have a market position.
But at the moment I am interested in the partnership development at ZT
For this reason I feel more excitement with ZT than the other brands I like.
Again, no brand bashing in my writings, it is just my personal and humble opinion.
As my favorite brands are ZT, Spyderco and Benchmade I feel comfortable to share my feelings about those brands.
I will buy more of their products anyway
