Blue Jays:
The shield doesn't get me into PO's, Federal buildings, parks, etc anymore than anyone else.
In the instance of the private property I mentioned I would have been aloowed in without the sheild as the knife was not illegal to have in this state anyway.
They [ the security personnel ] were just overly aggressive after the 9-11 incident.
I've had cops take knives from me but then have to give them back later as I had broken no laws in carrying what they assumed was contraband. They assumptions were wrong and when they were educated as to the correct rulings [statutes] relative blade length they returned my property post haste.
Any civilian who has a handle on the laws governing what they may or may not posses in public legally has the same recourse. It just isn'tr wise to argue with the LE on the street when he takes the knife he "believes" is illegal.
The real issues across the country I see are that most LE's are uninformed about the laws governing knives and have been preprogrammed through urban legend from older officers when they were pups ju8st on the force. Educating the law enforcement community of what is and isn't legal isn't that difficult but oftentimes necessary.
Most people would not push to get their knife back even when it was not illegal. Thats not the LE's issue but ours as carriers of these products.
One of the big jokes around here is the LE community believes that they are entitled [ exempt ] from the auto knife laws. In Massachusetts they are not exempt and are in violation of 269-10b of the mass statutes if they carry one as well.
Now it is true they will probably never be challenged due to their status within the community as LE's but then again if they are made aware of the laws they should have no problem complying with the same laws they enforce themselves.
I have gone round and round with the LE communities around me on this. Some have attitudes and others appreciate the heads up. Like any profession there are good and bad apples mixed in the bushel basket.
Know the laws in the area you are in at that time. Carry a copy of the pertinent statute with you when traveling. I carry a copy of the 269-10b statute in my glovebox.
See--I'm not anymore protected than the next swinging D%$k on the streets. The difference is I instruct LE's as an adjunct instructor, have a PI license in the state [ considered a professional by some and not by others ]and have worked for attys: long enough to realize that if you allow these people to take your property which is not illegal to possess in that district and do not persue the issues to retrieve your property if it is in fact confiscated you are part of the problem which continue until someone does make an issue out of it.
At my age and with the experience I have on the street and courts systems after 30 years, it gets easier to explain why you are not illegal in carrying the knife they are questioning.
As an aside, if I know the park service will search me and will confiscate anything knife on me I have the same choices here as everyone else. I can choose to leave them in the car or I can choose not to enter their property.
Then again, I can always choose to carry unconventional weapons which won't be noticed by them but are still capable of inflicting death or severe injury if I have to go that far.
Bic pens, my belt, the buckle, and things non magnetic [ they make some neat stuff that will get through the detectors these days ]are options if I so choose.
Do they have the right to ask you to search your bags at a hotel before checkin? I doubt it, but then it's your choice to comply or go elsewhere if thats their business policy and it is enforced for everyone. In the hotel scenario you could always hide the tool at check in and then retrieve it after you have paid for the room. Leave them in a car if you drove in. Very few would get to a hotel by cab from the airport but would have a rental car. Leave questionable items there until the check-in search is completed.
Use some common sense and you only need to work around the scenario instead of trying to fight their rules to be able to have what you want with you. Is it something we should expect after 9-11. Yes, it is.
Will there be unfairness in the functioning of the rules, of course there will, people carry their prejudice in different ways. Security will always be an issue and the more we are forced to check people the more we lose some of the freedoms we have enjoyed before 9-11.
The world we live in becomes more dangerous not less as time goes on and we need to find ways to work within the system even if that system isn't what we consider fair or logical.
When I attended knife training with Master at Arms James Keating over several years I drove from Boston to Little Rock and New Orleans instead of flying. Two reasons why--
1. I hate flying
2. I was able to carry my knives to the class and I was ableto bring long knives that would have just caused all kinds of issues had I tried to board the plane or they were found packed in the luggage.
I adjusted my schedule to fit MY needs on those trips. It would have been easier to fly into those cities but I was not prepared to go unarmed. Thats a choice I made and had no problem making it.
We have choices, we can choose not to go where we have to be disarmed [whether right or wrong ]or we can give up our tools to be in that area. The point is we all have choices, I know what mine are and why under most circiumstances and act accordingly.
Brownie