Honestly I really can't see how the "Talon Hole" is able to be supposedly patented and I doubt it would stand up in court if someone really wanted to press the matter (I suspect cases of infringement have only ever been settled out of court.) A hole in a short forward guard on a knife or sword almost CERTAINLY exists someplace historically. For a patent to hold up it actually has to be NOVEL. I'm pretty sure that a little research could dig up tons of "prior art" that would invalidate the Talon Hole. Probably no one wants to bother, though. Does anyone have a link to where the Talon Hole is patented? The only thing I was able to turn up was
THIS ornamental design patent and to my understanding that's not going to hold up unless we're talking about full-blown counterfeits or knock-offs of the total design. For a design patent to be truly infringed the offending item must be "substantially similar" and simply having a forward lanyard hole located in a short integral guard isn't enough, especially since the feature is a
functional one rather than purely decorative.I'm possibly wrong about all the above, as I'm no patent lawyer, but it kind of irks me when I see all the hullabaloo about "OMG TALON HOLE--TAKE IT TO COURT" and I don't see any real evidence that anything is actually being violated.Edit to add: By the way, I'm not pointing fingers at anyone in specific with regard to the whole Talon Hole thing. It's just something I've seen a lot of over the years.