NEW 4.7 Thread

If the SK line kept even all the same materials (3v being an amazing steel, yet remaining the least expensive option for the customer) and had 2 handle choices and a black sheath with a new, yet reputable guy or gal doing the final finishing, we'd really see a change. Forget Gerber or TOPS, what would stop this scenario of the SK models from competing with the Fiddleback Forge production line?

Two things:

1) Fiddleback Production Kephart is, spec-wise, on-par with the GSO-3.5 ... but costs $225 vs the GSO-3.5 first $184 (nevermind a cheaper 2nd or ugly betty). The GSO is the "budget" knife there. It's possible that the cost of the leather sheath is part of the Fiddleback's increase. *shrug*

2) When S!K previously released the SK-4.1 in S7 steel, the cost savings were on par with the comparison of the CruV 4.7 to the 3V 4.7, ~$20 savings? The materials still generally cost the same even if you limit the various options and the price difference between sheets of 3V vs Steel X. Maybe 1095 or 420HC would cut way down on that, but CruV did not and S7 did not. The smoothness of the finish on even the CruV bevels is beyond that of what Becker sells, so maybe they could save some on grinding by having the manufacturer skip a final step, but then they couldn't "peen" finish the bevels, which I don't think would be acceptable to them unless they gave it a coating like the Beckers or Tops/ESEE but that would again be outsourced. The HANDLES are evidently a BIG cost per knife, perhaps the biggest judging by comparisons of similar offerings from different companies....
The wording on the SK line
Our goal is to create a series of knives that are just as tough and capable as the GSO Series, while being more readily available and less expensive. These will be production knives made from Guy's designs.

GSOs are all "production knives" to some extent right now, and S!Ks trouble is getting them all finished and shipped after receiving the HT'd blanks and scales and sheaths into the shop. The knives must be built to customer specifications, handles may need some final machining, knives need to be sharpened, and Survive! simply does not have the man-power to get it done quick enough to satisfy consumer demand. So when I read the above wording, I imagine a contractor doing more of the work. Again, remember that Tops and ESEE do not make knives at all, they work the design and production end but are not manufacturers in any way. Fiddleback Forge has skilled craftsmen producing handmade awesomeness, but that is NOT the "production line" - those knives are made by Larrin Mfg and the scales by Nathan and the sheaths by JRE Industries. In order for S!K to put out knives in greater numbers at lower cost they need to either A) skimp on materials like handle scales, B) skimp a LOT on finishing, and/or C) hand over production to another company with more man-power and sufficiently low overhead to be able to offer the knife at a cheaper price point.

Again, the Fiddleback line is MORE expensive than S!K, Benchmades are nearly in the same range, Rowen stuff is cheaper presumably due to both steel and finishing (which includes how they just barely make the handle scales), and Becker and Buck just skip the nice handles altogether. ALL of the above mentioned companies have more man-power than S!K. If the SK line is really just going to be almost everything the same as the GSOs except they are being sharpened by an army of S!K employees right there in the S!K shop, then Guy and Ellie have a LOT of hiring to do :) Yes, that could be it, I have no special knowledge of it being otherwise, but it would simply be different from how most other companies are doing it. Bark River knives are production-manufactured, production HT'd, and then are convexed down by BRKT employees in-house and given handle scales - the handle scales are the primary role for BRKT. Their prices? Usually on par or higher than S!K. *shrug*
 
I would imagine that if a S! employee only had 2 handle colors as variables in the assembly of SK models I stead of making sure the first camo micarta 3v has a coyote sheath and the next has anot OD sheath and the next one needs black hardware with a black sheath.................. it would be more efficient. If some cool, new person is sharpening at a quicker pace, maybe the savings to customers would be seen mostly in time rather than money. These are all just my guesses :D



Also, good insight on the differences in process between the companies you mentioned.
 
I don't think they (survive) should aim to lower the cost at all. IMHO, survive should be selling their current 2nd grade knives and 1st grade knives for considerably more than they are, and a budget line (same general formula, different level of scrutiny and finish) for around their current price point.

Fiddleback's price point is only relevant if you include that they also leave a margin for their retailers...
 
I don't think they (survive) should aim to lower the cost at all. IMHO, survive should be selling their current 2nd grade knives and 1st grade knives for considerably more than they are, and a budget line (same general formula, different level of scrutiny and finish) for around their current price point.

Fiddleback's price point is only relevant if you include that they also leave a margin for their retailers...
Sk should make something like a 4.7 in 12c27 or a aus8 maybe and sell it for less, Chiral has some great ideas 👍having someone else handle the sk line and using cheaper steels I would definitely buy them
 
Sk should make something like a 4.7 in 12c27 or a aus8 maybe and sell it for less

Good lord, why?!

I'm a fan of 'lower' grade versions that impact the shelf appeal, but not the functionality. There are plenty of other tough, inexpensive steels (like cruforge, actually) that don't compromise much in the functionality department, but curb costs some.

Really, I doubt that materials are the major cost in any of their knives: it's man hours and machine time that add cost in really substantial ways. Skilled labour and tooling (and tooling wear) are the major costs, I'd wager. If you're trying to shave off that last 5-10%, then yeah, maybe choosing a substantially cheaper steel helps, but that's mostly true if you're trying to maximize a razor thin margin.
 
At the prices Survive charges I'm not convinced that the SK line will be that much cheaper.
I am really hoping that they will be simply be on the shelf, making knives made from Guy's great designs available to a wider customer base.
Being able to deliver product on demand should also reduce most of the consternation about the company's business model.
 
At the prices Survive charges I'm not convinced that the SK line will be that much cheaper.
I am really hoping that they will be simply be on the shelf, making knives made from Guy's great designs available to a wider customer base.
Being able to deliver product on demand should also reduce most of the consternation about the company's business model.

Yes!!!! Especially to the on the shelf and reducing consternation points you made.

Personally, I'm not really concerned with the SK line being less expensive, but rather more available, by whatever means would be needed.

The first SK line did use a different steel, but then it needed the extra step of getting coated.

Like timi said, if the steel choice won't end up creating all that much in monetary savings, just stick with the flagship d3v as the only steel option to streamline things, along with a more characteristically production knife fit and finish.
 
Good lord, why?!

I'm a fan of 'lower' grade versions that impact the shelf appeal, but not the functionality. There are plenty of other tough, inexpensive steels (like cruforge, actually) that don't compromise much in the functionality department, but curb costs some.

Really, I doubt that materials are the major cost in any of their knives: it's man hours and machine time that add cost in really substantial ways. Skilled labour and tooling (and tooling wear) are the major costs, I'd wager. If you're trying to shave off that last 5-10%, then yeah, maybe choosing a substantially cheaper steel helps, but that's mostly true if you're trying to maximize a razor thin margin.

You really think that 12c27 would compromise functionality that much ? Your average owner, if he ever uses it probably can't tell the difference between the two steels . I was just thinking of a way to get cost down so more people would be able to purchase an sk personally 200 bucks is a lot but I want the quality and craftsmanship , most people don't give a crap
 
You really think that 12c27 would compromise functionality that much ? Your average owner, if he ever uses it probably can't tell the difference between the two steels . I was just thinking of a way to get cost down so more people would be able to purchase an sk personally 200 bucks is a lot but I want the quality and craftsmanship , most people don't give a crap
Totally disagree. The most casual of use would quickly demonstrate the difference.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Haha, I had a time with my Ugly Betty tonight, decided to make her a stripper. I don't feel like I really know a knife till I bleed on it, suffice to say we were VERY acquainted tonight.

80171c28a654ad0b0233805cdb4f2ed8.jpg


e6fed0275aba6b07de1bb2085d3f3958.jpg


4dbdb18b691ab47f01f5107fafefea7e.jpg


cb3ac841f5491eadeb009eebebc8dde0.jpg


425d5f30a85c294de4a7f29698194e65.jpg


f242c4ed1dfc9b5e6218d7e7345e9642.jpg


Squish squish, haha!

dc93dc4c33b69f9b006f4d3f00b39385.jpg


07a665cd41291a9e4b95c4bb3bf957a6.jpg


9a1c324d5f6052df779a994e24bf4d4b.jpg


8e20b130eced23492337a6b869877db9.jpg


709eea9f9a136752766b760937c53400.jpg


All better!
 
It was pretty funny when the blood was in the glove. I may have made some big fart bubbles with the blood locked in.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
It made the funniest noises every time I clenched my fist, like the fart noises I tried to make in Middle School.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Oh my, hahaha, it's like Admiral Akbar on my hand!

1e48be4c96fd220acfde9a9d49811b49.jpg

It's a traaaaaaaaaap!!!!


Oh Grog, I love starting my day with a string of unexpected posts from you :D

I'm glad all it was is that tiny admiral. Seeing the first few pics, I was concerned a finger or two would stay in the glove when you took it off!
 
What use ? And how quickly? You have me very intrigued

Anything involving repeated cutting through hard materials and/or batonning, chopping, whatever. The edge stability would be a fraction of what it is with the currently spec'd steels, and never mind toughness. What's the point of even making a Survive! Knife if it's going to perform like a cold steel from 15+ years ago?

If you really wanted to save a buck, it'd be trivial to just switch from cruforge to 52100 - it'd perform similarly, minus some edge retention on account or less vanadium. As far as I know, cruforge is essentially 52100 with the metallurgy tweaked a bit to make it more forgeable. And 52100 is a decidedly un-boutique steel.

Anyways, we're splitting hairs. Yes, choosing a cheap steel can shave a few bucks off of the unit cost. But all you need to do is look at a Winkler blade, and the cheap spring steels he uses, and the final cost, to see that the price of a high end knife is minimally affected by the materials chosen.
 
Anything involving repeated cutting through hard materials and/or batonning, chopping, whatever. The edge stability would be a fraction of what it is with the currently spec'd steels, and never mind toughness. What's the point of even making a Survive! Knife if it's going to perform like a cold steel from 15+ years ago?

If you really wanted to save a buck, it'd be trivial to just switch from cruforge to 52100 - it'd perform similarly, minus some edge retention on account or less vanadium. As far as I know, cruforge is essentially 52100 with the metallurgy tweaked a bit to make it more forgeable. And 52100 is a decidedly un-boutique steel.

Anyways, we're splitting hairs. Yes, choosing a cheap steel can shave a few bucks off of the unit cost. But all you need to do is look at a Winkler blade, and the cheap spring steels he uses, and the final cost, to see that the price of a high end knife is minimally affected by the materials chosen.

Pretty much summed it up, thanks! Backyard cutting with a try stick or spoon carving is enough to demonstrate the improved edge retention and difference in retaining a working edge.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top